Sexual health promotion in people with severe mental illness: the RESPECT feasibility RCT

Author:

Hughes Elizabeth1ORCID,Mitchell Natasha2ORCID,Gascoyne Samantha2ORCID,Moe-Byrne Thirimon2ORCID,Edmondson Amanda1ORCID,Coleman Elizabeth2ORCID,Millett Lottie3ORCID,Ali Shehzad2ORCID,Dare Ceri4ORCID,Hewitt Catherine2ORCID,Johnson Sonia3ORCID,Llewellyn Carrie5ORCID,Mercer Catherine6ORCID,Nolan Fiona7ORCID,Walker Charlotte4,Watson Judith2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centre for Applied Research in Health, School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, UK

2. Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK

3. Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK

4. Expert by experience, UK

5. Department of Primary Care and Public Health, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK

6. Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK

7. School of Health and Social Care, University of Essex, Colchester, UK

Abstract

Background People with serious mental illness have sexual health needs, but there is limited evidence regarding effective interventions to promote their sexual health. Objectives To develop a sexual health promotion intervention for people with serious mental illness, and to conduct a feasibility trial in order to establish the acceptability and parameters for a fully powered trial. Design A two-armed randomised controlled, open feasibility study comparing usual care alone with usual care plus the adjunctive intervention. Setting Five community mental health providers in Leeds, Barnsley, Brighton and London. Participants Adults aged ≥ 18 years with serious mental illness and receiving care from community mental health teams. Interventions A remote, web-based computer randomisation system allocated participants to usual care plus the RESPECT (Randomised Evaluation of Sexual health Promotion Effectiveness informing Care and Treatment) intervention (three sessions of 1 hour) (intervention arm) or usual care only (control arm). The intervention was an interactive manualised package of exercises, quizzes and discussion topics focusing on knowledge, motivation and behavioural intentions to adopt safer sexual behaviours. Main outcome measures Feasibility parameters including establishing the percentage of people who were eligible, consented and were retained in each arm of the trial, retention for the intervention, as well as the completeness of the data collection. Data were collected on knowledge, motivation to adopt safer sexual behaviour, sexual behaviour, sexual stigma, sexual health service use and quality of life. Data were collected at baseline and then at 3 months and 6 months post randomisation. Results Of a target of 100 participants, 72 people participated in the trial over 12 months. Of the 36 participants randomised to the intervention arm, 27 received some of the intervention (75.0%). At 3 months, 59 of the 72 participants completed follow-up questionnaires (81.9%) (30 participants from the intervention arm and 29 participants from the control arm). Only the first 38 participants were followed up at 6 months. However, data were collected on 29 out of 38 participants (76.3% retention): 13 in the intervention arm and 16 in the control arm. No adverse events were reported. Participant feedback confirmed that both the design and the intervention were acceptable. The economic analysis indicated high completion rates and completeness of data among participants who continued the trial. Conclusions Despite the limitations, the findings suggest that it is both acceptable and feasible to undertake a sexual health promotion study for people with serious mental illness. Future work A fully powered randomised controlled trial would be required to establish the clinical effectiveness of the intervention. Trial registration Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN15747739. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 23, No. 65. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Funder

Health Technology Assessment programme

Publisher

National Institute for Health Research

Subject

Health Policy

Reference61 articles.

1. Definition and prevalence of severe and persistent mental illness;Ruggeri;Br J Psychiatry,2000

2. British Medical Association (BMA). Recognising the Importance of Physical Health in Mental Health and Intellectual Disability: Achieving Parity of Outcomes. London: BMA; 2014.

3. Department of Health and Social Care. Improving the Physical Health of People with Mental Health Problems. Actions for Mental Health Nurses. London: Department of Health and Social Care; 2016.

4. Identifying and addressing sexual health in serious mental illness: views of mental health staff working in two NHS organizations in England;Hughes;Int J Ment Health Nurs.,2018

5. World Health Organization (WHO). Sexual and Reproductive Health: Defining Sexual Health. Geneva: WHO; 2006. URL: www.who.int/reproductivehealth/topics/sexual_health/sh_definitions/en/ (accessed 27 July 2018).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3