Implementing early rehabilitation and mobilisation for children in UK paediatric intensive care units: the PERMIT feasibility study

Author:

Scholefield Barnaby R1ORCID,Menzies Julie C2ORCID,McAnuff Jennifer3ORCID,Thompson Jacqueline Y1ORCID,Manning Joseph C4ORCID,Feltbower Richard G5ORCID,Geary Michelle6ORCID,Lockley Sophie7ORCID,Morris Kevin P2ORCID,Moore David8ORCID,Pathan Nazima9ORCID,Kirkham Fenella6ORCID,Forsyth Robert10ORCID,Rapley Tim11ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Birmingham Acute Care Research Group, Institute of Inflammation and Ageing, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

2. Paediatric Intensive Care, Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK

3. Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK

4. Nottingham Children’s Hospital, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK

5. Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

6. Child Health, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK

7. PPIE Representative, Birmingham Women’s and Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK

8. Institute of Applied Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

9. Department of Paediatrics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK

10. Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK

11. Department of Social Work, Education and Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle, UK

Abstract

Background Early rehabilitation and mobilisation encompass patient-tailored interventions, delivered within intensive care, but there are few studies in children and young people within paediatric intensive care units. Objectives To explore how healthcare professionals currently practise early rehabilitation and mobilisation using qualitative and quantitative approaches; co-design the Paediatric Early Rehabilitation and Mobilisation during InTensive care manual of early rehabilitation and mobilisation interventions, with primary and secondary patient-centred outcomes; explore feasibility and acceptability of implementing the Paediatric Early Rehabilitation and Mobilisation during InTensive care manual within three paediatric intensive care units. Design Mixed-methods feasibility with five interlinked studies (scoping review, survey, observational study, codesign workshops, feasibility study) in three phases. Setting United Kingdom paediatric intensive care units. Participants Children and young people aged 0–16 years remaining within paediatric intensive care on day 3, their parents/guardians and healthcare professionals. Interventions In Phase 3, unit-wide implementation of manualised early rehabilitation and mobilisation. Main outcome measures Phase 1 observational study: prevalence of any early rehabilitation and mobilisation on day 3. Phase 3 feasibility study: acceptability of early rehabilitation and mobilisation intervention; adverse events; acceptability of study design; acceptability of outcome measures. Data sources Searched Excerpta Medica Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, MEDLINE, PEDro, Open grey and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Review methods Narrative synthesis. Results In the scoping review we identified 36 full-text reports evaluating rehabilitation initiated within 7 days of paediatric intensive care unit admission, outlining non-mobility and mobility early rehabilitation and mobilisation interventions from 24 to 72 hours and delivered twice daily. With the survey, 124/191 (65%) responded from 26/29 (90%) United Kingdom paediatric intensive care units; the majority considered early rehabilitation and mobilisation a priority. The observational study followed 169 patients from 15 units; prevalence of any early rehabilitation and mobilisation on day 3 was 95.3%. We then developed a manualised early rehabilitation and mobilisation intervention informed by current evidence, experience and theory. All three sites implemented the Paediatric Early Rehabilitation and Mobilisation during InTensive care manual successfully, recruited to target (30 patients recruited) and followed up the patients until day 30 or discharge; 21/30 parents consented to complete additional outcome measures. Limitations The findings represent the views of National Health Service staff but may not be generalisable. We were unable to conduct workshops and interviews with children, young people and parents to support the Paediatric Early Rehabilitation and Mobilisation during InTensive care manual development due to pandemic restrictions. Conclusions A randomised controlled trial is recommended to assess the effectiveness of the manualised early rehabilitation and mobilisation intervention. Future work A definitive cluster randomised trial of early rehabilitation and mobilisation in paediatric intensive care requires selection of outcome measure and health economic evaluation. Study registration The study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42019151050. The Phase 1 observational study is registered Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04110938 (Phase 1) (registered 1 October 2019) and the Phase 3 feasibility study is registered NCT04909762 (Phase 3) (registered 2 June 2021). Funding This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 17/21/06) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 27, No. 27. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Funder

Health Technology Assessment programme

Publisher

National Institute for Health and Care Research

Subject

Health Policy

Reference128 articles.

1. Rayyan: a web and mobile app for systematic reviews;Ouzzani;Syst Rev,2016

2. A newly developed tool for classifying study designs in systematic reviews of interventions and exposures showed substantial reliability and validity;Seo;J Clin Epidemiol,2016

3. Assessing the outcome of pediatric intensive care;Fiser;J Pediatr,1992

4. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials;Sterne;BMJ,2019

5. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions;Sterne;BMJ (Clin Res Ed),2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3