Ondansetron for irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea: randomised controlled trial

Author:

Gunn David1ORCID,Topan Rabia2ORCID,Fried Ron3ORCID,Holloway Ivana4ORCID,Brindle Richard4ORCID,Hartley Suzanne4ORCID,Barnard Lorna4ORCID,Corsetti Maura5ORCID,Scott S Mark2ORCID,Farmer Adam6ORCID,Akbar Ayesha7ORCID,Eugenicos Maria8ORCID,Trudgill Nigel9ORCID,Kapur Kapil10ORCID,McLaughlin John11ORCID,Sanders David S12ORCID,Ramadas Arvind13ORCID,Whorwell Peter14ORCID,Houghton Lesley15ORCID,Dinning Phil G16ORCID,Aziz Qasim2ORCID,Ford Alexander C17ORCID,Farrin Amanda4ORCID,Spiller Robin1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. NIHR Nottingham Digestive Diseases Biomedical Research Centre, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK

2. Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK

3. Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

4. Clinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

5. Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK

6. Royal Stoke Hospital, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, Stoke, UK

7. St Mark’s Hospital, Harrow, UK

8. University of Edinburgh, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, UK

9. Sandwell and West Birmingham NHS Trust, Birmingham, UK

10. Barnsley Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Barnsley, UK

11. University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK

12. Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK

13. Tees Valley Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK

14. University of Manchester, Manchester, UK

15. St James’s University Hospital, Leeds, UK

16. Discipline of Surgery and Gastroenterology, Flinders Medical Centre, Flinders University, South Australia, Australia

17. Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St. James’s, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK

Abstract

Background Irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea is characterised by frequent, loose or watery stools with associated urgency, resulting in marked reduction of quality of life. Ondansetron, a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist, has been shown to benefit patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea. Objective To evaluate the effect of ondansetron in irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea. Design Phase III, parallel-group, randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled trial in 400 patients, with embedded mechanistic studies. Setting Hospital, primary care and community. Participants Eighty participants meeting Rome IV criteria for irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea. Intervention Ondansetron 4 mg (dose titrated up to two tablets three times a day) or matched placebo for 12 weeks. Main outcome measures Clinical – Primary patient-reported end point was % ‘Food and Drug Administration-defined responders’ over 12 weeks. Secondary end points were worst abdominal pain intensity, worst urgency, stool consistency, stool frequency, anxiety, depression and dyspepsia at 12 and 16 weeks. Main outcome measures Mechanistic – Whole gut transit time, faecal water, protease (FP), bile acids and assessment of rectal sensitivity using a barostat. Results Clinical – The study closed early due to slow recruitment. Between 1 January 2018 and 11 May 2020, 80 patients were recruited and randomised (20% of target), 37 to ondansetron, 43 to placebo. Discontinuations (4 ondansetron; 2 placebo) meant 75 completed the 12-week trial treatment. There were four protocol violations. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 15 (40.5%) on ondansetron were primary end-point responders (95% CI 24.7% to 56.4%), and 12 (27.9%) on placebo (95% CI 14.5% to 41.3%), p = 0.19, adjusted OR 1.93 (0.73, 5.11). Pain intensity reduction occurred in 17 (46.0%) on ondansetron (95% CI 29.9% to 62.0%) and 16 (37.2%) on placebo (95% CI 22.8% to 51.7%), p = 0.32. Improvement in stool consistency occurred in 25 (67.6%) on ondansetron (95% CI 52.5% to 82.7%) and 22 (51.2%) on placebo (95% CI 36.2% to 66.1%), p = 0.07. Use of rescue medication, loperamide, was lower on ondansetron [7 (18.9%) vs. 17 (39.5%)]. Average stool consistency in the final month of treatment reduced significantly more on ondansetron, adjusted mean difference –0.5 [standard error (SE) 0.25, 95% CI (–1.0 to –0.02), p = 0.042]. Ondansetron improved dyspepsia score (SFLDQ), adjusted mean difference –3.2 points [SE 1.43, 95% CI (–6.1 to –0.4), p = 0.028]. There were no serious adverse events. Mechanistic – mean (SD). Ondansetron increased whole gut transit time between baseline and week 12 by 3.8 (9.1) hours on ondansetron, significantly more than on placebo –2.2 (10.3), p = 0.01. Mean volume to reach urgency threshold using the barostat increased on ondansetron by 84 (61) ml and 38 (48) ml on placebo, n = 8, p = 0.26. Ondansetron did not significantly alter protease, faecal water or bile acids. Changes in referral pathways substantially reduced referrals, impairing recruitment, which meant the study was underpowered. Conclusion Our results are consistent with previous studies and confirmed ondansetron improves stool consistency and urgency but showed minor effect on pain. We plan to undertake a simplified version of this trial overcoming the changed referral pathways by recruiting in primary care, using software linked to primary care records to identify and randomise patients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea to ondansetron or placebo and remotely follow their progress; thus minimising barriers to recruitment. Trial registration This trial is registered as ISRCTN17508514. Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation programme and will be published in full in Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation; Vol. 10, No. 9. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Funder

Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation programme

Publisher

National Institute for Health and Care Research

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3