Decision-Making Methods in Transport Policy: a Multi-Criteria Approach

Author:

Karlov A. V.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Russian University of Transport

Abstract

Transport policy includes various aspects of government regulation of transport and related industries. Decision-making in transport policy must consider a wide range of factors and evaluate options for the consequences of adoption of certain decisions based on various criteria, such as cost, environmental impact, and social effects. Two widely used decision-making tools in transport policy are multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) and cost-benefit analysis (CBA).The objective of the study was to select decision support methods for transport policy that consider aspects other than monetary or hardly formalised onesAs a practical experiment, the study selected and ranked projects currently considered promising, per as they correspond to a given target using T Saat/s analytic hierarchy process. Several criteria developed within the framework of the study are proposed for the purpose of applied assessment of the pool of projects and their prioritisation.Application of such criteria and AHP allowed to develop a new applied tool for evaluating projects for subsequent use in the system of state administration of the transport industry. The study concludes that although CBA and MCDA methods have their strengths and weaknesses, the choice of method should depend on the specific context of the project. 

Publisher

FSBEO HPE Moscow State University of Railway Engineering (MIIT)

Subject

General Medicine

Reference22 articles.

1. Browne, D., Ryan, L. Comparative analysis of evaluation techniques for transport policies. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 2011, Vol. 31 (3), pp. 226-233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2010.11.001.

2. Ledney, A. Yu. The methods of economic efficiency evaluation of transport infrastructure projects. Ekonomika zheleznykh dorog, 2019, Iss. 9, pp. 14-24. [Electronic resource]: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=39554648. Last accessed 10.02.2023.

3. Medvedev, P. V. The assessment of the public effectiveness of transport infrastructure projects on the basis of «cost-benefit» analysis. Vestnik universiteta, 2015, Iss. 10, pp. 125-131. [Electronic resource]: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=24895593. Last accessed 10.02.2023.

4. Vickerman, R. Beyond cost-benefit analysis: the search for a comprehensive evaluation of transport investment. Research in Transportation Economics, 2017, Vol. 63, pp. 5-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2017.04.003.

5. Mackie, P., Worsley, T., Eliasson, J. Transport appraisal revisited. Research in Transportation Economics, 2014, Vol. 47 (1), pp. 3-18. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2014.09.013.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3