The Russian Federation’s Aggression against Ukraine – an attack against the international law-based security system

Author:

BANTAȘ Dragoș-Adrian, ,BĂLĂNICĂ Sebastian,

Abstract

In the realistic paradigm within the discipline of international relations in which states act based on a lucid and rational analysis of their own interests, the actions of the Russian Federation at the international level can be given justifications located in a gray area characterized by imprecision par excellence, between the necessity of ensuring its own security and the desire to dominate the space adjacent to its imperial center. In this context, the boundary between the prevalence of the conceptions specific to the natural law that determine the specified actions and the manifest justification of real interests based on these conceptions blurs in turn. What persists is Russia’s refusal to accept a rulesbased international order, seen as a conceptual framework of America in particular and Western origin in general. In this context, Russia takes, at least on a superficial level, the desideratum of such an international order, but interprets it through its own filter, based in particular on natural law.

Publisher

Univeritatea Nationala de Aparare Carol I

Subject

General Medicine

Reference32 articles.

1. Akashi, Kinji. 1998. Cornelius van Bynkershoek: His Role in the History of International Law.Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

2. Ballis, William. 1937. The Legal Position of War: Changes in its Practice and Theory from Plato to Vattel. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.

3. Bantaș, Dragoș-Adrian and Sebastian Bălănică. 2013. "The actions of the Russian Federation from the perspective of individual responsibility" Buletinul of "Carol I" National Defence University, No. 2: 105-119.

4. Black, Cyril E. 2019. Understanding Soviet Politics: The Perspective Of Russian History.NewYork: Routledge.

5. Blume, Lesley M.M. 2022. "U.S. nuclear testing's devastating legacy lingers, 30 years after moratorium". www.nationalgeographic.com.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3