Affiliation:
1. Departments of Surgery,
2. Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA 94089
3. Biostatistics, and
4. Pathology, Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15213
Abstract
Abstract
Background: PCR-based assays can improve clinical care, but they remain technically demanding and labor-intensive. We describe a new instrument, the GeneXpert®, that performs automated nucleic acid isolation, reverse transcription, and fluorescence-based quantitative PCR in ∼35 min.
Methods: Yield and integrity of RNA isolated on the GeneXpert were compared with Qiagen-based extraction for parallel samples (5-μm frozen tissue sections). The reproducibility of automated RNA isolation, reverse transcription, and quantitative PCR was determined by replicate (n = 10) analysis of 10 tissues, using duplex (target and endogenous control) reverse transcription-PCR reactions for two gene combinations. The GeneXpert was then used to perform rapid analysis of lymph nodes from melanoma, breast cancer, and lung cancer patients and analysis of melanoma metastatic to the lung, primary lung adenocarcinoma, and healthy lung tissue.
Results: On the GeneXpert, RNA was recovered in slightly over 6 min, and the yield was ∼70% of that from parallel Qiagen reactions. The RNA integrity was comparable to that of Qiagen-isolated RNA as determined by gel electrophoresis. For the melanoma samples, the 95% prediction interval for the ΔCt for a new measurement was ±1.54 cycles, and for breast cancer samples, the interval for a newly observed ΔCt was ±1.40 cycles. GeneXpert assays successfully detected the presence of metastatic melanoma, breast cancer, and lung cancer in lymph nodes and also differentiated among metastatic melanoma, lung adenocarcinoma, and healthy lung.
Conclusions: RNA yield and integrity on the GeneXpert are comparable to benchtop methods. Reproducibility of the GeneXpert data is similar to that seen with manual methods in our hands but may need improvement for some applications. The GeneXpert can perform RNA isolation, reverse transcription, and quantitative PCR in ∼35 min and could therefore be used for intraoperative testing when applicable.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry
Reference31 articles.
1. Ginzinger DG, Godfrey TE, Nigro J, Moore DH, Suzuki S, Pallavicini MG, et al. Measurement of DNA copy number at microsatellite loci using quantitative PCR analysis. Cancer Res2000;60:5405-5409.
2. Godfrey TE, Raja S, Finkelstein SD, Gooding WE, Kelly LA, Luketich JD. Prognostic value of quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction in lymph node-negative esophageal cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res2001;7:4041-4048.
3. Suzuki S, Moore DH, Ginzinger DG, Godfrey TE, Barclay J, Powell B, et al. An approach to analysis of large-scale correlations between genome changes and clinical endpoints in ovarian cancer. Cancer Res2000;60:5382-5385.
4. Tassone F, Hagerman RJ, Taylor AK, Gane LW, Godfrey TE, Hagerman PJ. Elevated levels of FMR1 mRNA in carrier males: a new mechanism of involvement in the fragile-X syndrome. Am J Hum Genet2000;66:6-15.
5. Wittwer CT, Fillmore GC, Garling DJ. Minimizing the time required for DNA amplification by efficient heat transfer to small samples. Anal Biochem1990;186:328-331.