Current Evidence and Future Perspectives on the Effective Practice of Patient-Centered Laboratory Medicine

Author:

Hallworth Mike J1,Epner Paul L2,Ebert Christoph3,Fantz Corinne R4,Faye Sherry A5,Higgins Trefor N6,Kilpatrick Eric S7,Li Wenzhe8,Rana S V9,Vanstapel Florent10

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Royal Shrewsbury Hospital, Shrewsbury, Shropshire, UK

2. Paul Epner LLC, Evanston, IL

3. Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Penzberg, Germany

4. Labsource LLC, Atlanta, GA

5. Beckman Coulter Eurocenter SA, Nyon, Switzerland

6. DynaLIFE Dx, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

7. Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Hull Royal Infirmary, Hull, UK

8. NMS Labs, Willow Grove, PA

9. Department of Gastroenterology, PGIMER, Chandigarh, India

10. University Hospitals Leuven-Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium

Abstract

AbstractBACKGROUNDSystematic evidence of the contribution made by laboratory medicine to patient outcomes and the overall process of healthcare is difficult to find. An understanding of the value of laboratory medicine, how it can be determined, and the various factors that influence it is vital to ensuring that the service is provided and used optimally.CONTENTThis review summarizes existing evidence supporting the impact of laboratory medicine in healthcare and indicates the gaps in our understanding. It also identifies deficiencies in current utilization, suggests potential solutions, and offers a vision of a future in which laboratory medicine is used optimally to support patient care.SUMMARYTo maximize the value of laboratory medicine, work is required in 5 areas: (a) improved utilization of existing and new tests; (b) definition of new roles for laboratory professionals that are focused on optimizing patient outcomes by adding value at all points of the diagnostic brain-to-brain cycle; (c) development of standardized protocols for prospective patient-centered studies of biomarker clinical effectiveness or extraanalytical process effectiveness; (d) benchmarking of existing and new tests in specified situations with commonly accepted measures of effectiveness; (e) agreed definition and validation of effectiveness measures and use of checklists for articles submitted for publication. Progress in these areas is essential if we are to demonstrate and enhance the value of laboratory medicine and prevent valuable information being lost in meaningless data. This requires effective collaboration with clinicians, and a determination to accept patient outcome and patient experience as the primary measure of laboratory effectiveness.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Biochemistry, medical,Clinical Biochemistry

Reference76 articles.

1. The 70% claim: what is the evidence base?;Hallworth;Ann Clin Biochem,2011

2. In vitro diagnostics (IVD) market, techniques and applications;Research and Markets,2013

3. Met and unmet needs of the automated clinical laboratory;Gambino;Trans N Y Acad Sci,1970

4. Acting on significant laboratory results;Lundberg;JAMA,1981

Cited by 57 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3