Quality Monitoring of a FIT-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Program

Author:

Toes-Zoutendijk Esther1,Bonfrer Johannes M G2,Ramakers Christian3,Thelen Marc4,Spaander Manon C W5,Dekker Evelien6,van der Meulen Miriam P1,Buskermolen Maaike1,van Vuuren Anneke J5,Kuipers Ernst J5,van Kemenade Folkert J7,van Velthuysen Marie-Louise F7,Thomeer Maarten G J8,van Veldhuizen Harriët9,van Ballegooijen Marjolein1,de Koning Harry J1,van Leerdam Monique E10,Lansdorp-Vogelaar Iris1

Affiliation:

1. Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

2. Clinical Chemistry, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

3. Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

4. Clinical Chemistry and Hematology, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands

5. Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

6. Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

7. Pathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

8. Radiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

9. Quality Improvement, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

10. Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Quality assessment is crucial for consistent program performance of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs using fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin (FIT). However, literature on the consistency of FIT performance in laboratory medicine was lacking. This study examined the consistency of FIT in testing positive or detecting advanced neoplasia (AN) for different specimen collection devices, lot reagents, and laboratories. METHODS All participants with a FIT sample with a cutoff concentration of 47 μg Hb/g feces in the Dutch CRC screening program in 2014 and 2015 were included in the analyses. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to estimate the odds ratios of collection devices, reagents, and laboratories on testing positive or detecting AN and positive predictive value (PPV). RESULTS In total, 87519 (6.4%) of the 1371169 participants tested positive. Positivity rates and detection rates of AN differed between collection devices and reagents (all P < 0.01). In contrast, PPVs were not found to vary between collection devices, reagents, or laboratories (all P > 0.05). Positivity rates showed a small difference for laboratories (P = 0.004) but not for detection rates of AN. Size of the population affected by the deviating positivity rates was small (0.1% of the total tested population). CONCLUSIONS Variations were observed in positivity and detection rates between collection devices and reagents, but there was no detected variation in PPV. Although the overall population effect of these variations on the screened population is expected to be modest, there is room for improvement.

Funder

Dutch National Institute

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry

Reference13 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3