Affiliation:
1. Departments of Pathology and Oncology,
2. National Cancer Institute of Milan, Milan, Italy
3. University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
4. Ciphergen Biosystems, Inc., Fremont, CA
5. Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD
Abstract
Abstract
Background: We previously selected a panel of 3 breast cancer biomarkers (BC1, BC2, and BC3) from serum samples collected at a single hospital based on their collective contribution to the optimal separation of breast cancer patients and noncancer controls by surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF MS). The identities and general applicability of these markers, however, were unknown. In this study, we performed protein expression profiling on samples obtained from a second hospital, included a greater number of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) cases, and performed purification and identification of the 2 confirmed markers.
Methods: Using a case–control study design, we performed protein expression profiling on serum samples from the National Cancer Institute (Milan, Italy). The validation sample cohort consisted of 61 women with locally invasive breast cancer, 32 with DCIS, 37 with various benign breast diseases (including 13 atypical), and 46 age-matched apparently healthy women (age range, 44–68 years). Validated biomarkers were purified and identified with serial chromatography, 1-dimensional gel electrophoresis, in-gel ASP-N digestion, peptide mass fingerprinting, and tandem mass peptide sequencing.
Results: The BC3 and BC2 expression patterns in this sample set were consistent with the first study sample set. BC3 and BC2 were identified to be complement component C3adesArg and a C-terminal–truncated form of C3adesArg, respectively.
Conclusions: Evaluation of biomarkers in independent sample sets can help determine the broader utility of candidate markers, and protein identification permits understanding of their molecular basis. C3adesArg appears to lack specificity among patients with benign diseases, limiting its utility as a stand-alone tumor marker, but it may still be useful in a multimarker panel for early detection of breast cancer.
Funder
Ciphergen Biosystems, Inc.
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry
Reference30 articles.
1. Jemal A, Tiwari RC, Murray T, Ghafoor A, Samuels A, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin2004;54:8-29.
2. Antman K, Shea S. Screening mammography under age 50. JAMA1999;281:1470-1472.
3. Smith RA, Cokkinides V, Eyre HJ. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer, 2004. CA Cancer J Clin2004;54:41-52.
4. Chan DW, Sell S. Tumor markers. Burtis CA Ashwood ER eds. Tietz textbook of clinical chemistry, 3rd ed1999:390-413 WB Saunders Philadelphia. .
5. Li J, Zhang Z, Rosenzweig J, Wang YY, Chan DW. Proteomics and bioinformatics approaches for identification of serum biomarkers to detect breast cancer. Clin Chem2002;48:1296-1304.
Cited by
143 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献