Postanalytical External Quality Assessment of Blood Glucose and Hemoglobin A1c: An International Survey

Author:

Skeie Svein1,Perich Carmen2,Ricos Carmen2,Araczki Agnes3,Horvath Andrea R3,Oosterhuis Wytze P4,Bubner Tanya5,Nordin Gunnar6,Delport Rhena7,Thue Geir1,Sandberg Sverre1

Affiliation:

1. NOKLUS, Norwegian Centre for Quality Improvement of Primary Care Laboratories, Section for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Health Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway

2. Laboratori Clı́nic Bon Pastor Barcelona and the Analytical Quality Commission of the Spanish Society of Clinical Biochemistry and Molecular Pathology (SEQC), Barcelona, Spain

3. Department of Clinical Chemistry, University of Szeged, Albert Szent-Gyorgyi Medical and Pharmaceutical Centre, Szeged, Hungary

4. Department of Clinical Chemistry, St. Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands

5. The Department of General Practice, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia

6. EQUALIS AB, Uppsala, Sweden

7. Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

Abstract

Abstract Background: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is diagnosed and monitored worldwide by blood glucose (BG) and glycohemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) testing, respectively. Methods for quality assessment of clinician interpretations of changes in these laboratory results have been developed. This study uses survey responses from general practitioners (GPs) in different countries to investigate possible differences in interpretation of results, as well as the feasibility of performing international postanalytical external quality assessment surveys (P-EQAS). Methods: GPs recruited from 7 countries received questionnaires requesting interpretation of changes in a potentially diagnostic capillary BG result and an HbA1c value obtained during monitoring of a patient with type 2 DM. GPs were asked to estimate clinically significant differences between 2 consecutive laboratory results [critical difference (CD)/reference change value] for both BG and HbA1c. The CDs reported by GPs were used to calculate the analytical variation (CVa), which was taken as the quality specification for analytical imprecision. Participants received national benchmarking feedback reports after the survey. Results: The study included responses from 2538 GPs. CDs in BG results showed the same pattern and were comparable among countries. Calculated median CVa values would be possible to attain at 80% confidence but not at the conventional 95% confidence. For HbA1c, the same pattern was shown across countries, but with lower changes considered true when HbA1c increased than when it decreased. Despite the consistent pattern, variations among GPs were considerable in all countries. Conclusions: Assessments of CDs for BG and HbA1c were similar internationally, and quality specifications for these analytes based on clinicians’ opinions are therefore interchangeable among countries. International P-EQAS may contribute to a more rational use of laboratory services and clinical guidelines.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Biochemistry, medical,Clinical Biochemistry

Cited by 30 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3