Error Methods Are More Practical, But Uncertainty Methods May Still Be Preferred-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Error Methods Are More Practical, But Uncertainty Methods May Still Be Preferred

Published:2018-04-01 Issue:4 Volume:64 Page:636-638
ISSN:0009-9147
Container-title:Clinical Chemistry
language:en
Short-container-title:

Author:

Westgard James O¹

Affiliation:

1. University of Wisconsin School of Public Health and Westgard QC, Inc., Madison WI

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry

Link

http://academic.oup.com/clinchem/article-pdf/64/4/636/32641794/clinchem0636.pdf

Reference15 articles.

1. The use of error and uncertainty methods in the medical laboratory;Oosterhuis;Clin Chem Lab Med,2018

2. Special issue: First EFLM Strategic Conference defining analytical performance goals—15 years after the Stockholm conference;Clin Chem Lab Med,2015

3. Medical laboratories—particular requirements for quality and competence;ISO 15189:2007,2007

4. Guide to expression of uncertainty in measurement;GUM,1995

5. Criteria for judging precision and accuracy in method development and evaluation;Westgard;Clin Chem,1974

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Bias in Laboratory Medicine: The Dark Side of the Moon;Annals of Laboratory Medicine;2023-09-04

2. Personalized Therapy for Mycophenolate: Consensus Report by the International Association of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring and Clinical Toxicology;Therapeutic Drug Monitoring;2021-04

3. Measurement uncertainty as a universal concept: can it be universally applicable in routine laboratory practice?;Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences;2020-07-16

4. Measurement uncertainty: light in the shadows;Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM);2020-03-05

5. Interpol review of toxicology 2016–2019;Forensic Science International: Synergy;2020