Blood Sample Transportation by Pneumatic Transportation Systems: A Systematic Literature Review

Author:

Nybo Mads1,Lund Merete E2,Titlestad Kjell2,Maegaard Christian U3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

2. Department of Clinical Immunology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

3. Facilities Management, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND Pneumatic transportation systems (PTSs) are increasingly used for transportation of blood samples to the core laboratory. Many studies have investigated the impact of these systems on different types of analyses, but to elucidate whether PTSs in general are safe for transportation of blood samples, existing literature on the subject was systematically assessed. METHODS A systematic literature review was conducted following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and metaanalyses (PRISMA) Statement guidelines to gather studies investigating the impact of PTS on analyses in blood samples. Studies were extracted from PubMed and Embase. The search period ended November 2016. RESULTS A total of 39 studies were retrieved. Of these, only 12 studies were conducted on inpatients, mainly intensive care unit patients. Blood gases, hematology, and clinical chemistry were well investigated, whereas coagulation, rotational thromboelastometry, and platelet function in acutely ill patients were addressed by only 1 study each. Only a few parameters were affected in a clinically significant way (clotting time parameter in extrinsic system thromboelastometry, pO2 in blood gas, multiplate analysis, and the hemolysis index). CONCLUSIONS Owing to their high degree of heterogeneity, the retrieved studies were unable to supply evidence for the safety of using PTSs for blood sample transportation. In consequence, laboratories need to measure and document the actual acceleration forces in their existing PTS, instituting quality target thresholds for these measurements such as acceleration vector sums. Computer modeling might be applied to the evaluation of future PTS installations. With the increasing use of PTS, a harmonized, international recommendation on this topic is warranted.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry

Reference42 articles.

1. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement;Moher;PLoS Med,2009

2. Chapter 5: Defining the review question and developing criteria for including studies. [updated February 2008];O'Connor;Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.0.0,2008

3. Are TEG (®) results in healthy blood donors affected by the transport of blood samples in a pneumatic tube system?;Espinosa;Int J Lab Hematol,2016

4. Effect of pneumatic tube delivery system rate and distance on hemolysis of blood specimens;Evliyaoğlu;J Clin Lab Anal,2012

5. Hemolysis associated with pneumatic tube system transport for blood samples;Kara;Pak J Med Sci,2014

Cited by 28 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3