EurA1c: The European HbA1c Trial to Investigate the Performance of HbA1c Assays in 2166 Laboratories across 17 Countries and 24 Manufacturers by Use of the IFCC Model for Quality Targets

Author:

,Weykamp Cas,John W Garry,English Emma,Erasmus Rajiv T,Sacks David B,Buchta Christoph,Mueller Mathias M,Lenga Yolande,Budina Marek,Kratochvila Josef,Friedecky Bedrich,Siest Jean-Pascal,Kaiser Patricia,Haliassos Alexander,Panagiotakis Otto,Makris Konstantinos,Graham Hazel,Kane Anne,Smith Thomas P,Barrett Ned,Sciacovelli Laura,Plebani Mario,Faria Ana Andrade,Cardoso Ana,Correia Helena,Alemany Montserrat Ventura,Alsina Carmen Perich,Gómez Carmen González,Nordin Gunnar,Persson Carita Krook,Fried Roman,Akcadag Fatma,Akgöz Müslüm,Aslan Diler,Jones Samantha,Thomas Annette,Gillery Philippe,Jaisson Stéphane,Mosca Andrea,Paleari Renata,Slingerland Robbert J,Slootstra Janine,Leppink Sanne,Elmgren Anders,Little Randie R,Connolly Shawn M,Makky Vicky,Nowicki Maren,Siebelder Carla,Schröer-Janssen Liesbeth,te Winkel Marieke,de Graaf Irene,Lenters-Westra Erna

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND A major objective of the IFCC Committee on Education and Use of Biomarkers in Diabetes is to generate awareness and improvement of HbA1c assays through evaluation of the performance by countries and manufacturers. METHODS Fresh whole blood and lyophilized hemolysate specimens manufactured from the same pool were used by 17 external quality assessment organizers to evaluate analytical performance of 2166 laboratories. Results were evaluated per country, per manufacturer, and per manufacturer and country combined according to criteria of the IFCC model for quality targets. RESULTS At the country level with fresh whole blood specimens, 6 countries met the IFCC criterion, 2 did not, and 2 were borderline. With lyophilized hemolysates, 5 countries met the criterion, 2 did not, and 3 were borderline. At the manufacturer level using fresh whole blood specimens, 13 manufacturers met the criterion, 8 did not, and 3 were borderline. Using lyophilized hemolysates, 7 manufacturers met the criterion, 6 did not, and 3 were borderline. In both country and manufacturer groups, the major contribution to total error derived from between-laboratory variation. There were no substantial differences in performance between groups using fresh whole blood or lyophilized hemolysate samples. CONCLUSIONS The state of the art is that 1 of 20 laboratories does not meet the IFCC criterion, but there are substantial differences between country and between manufacturer groups. Efforts to further improve quality should focus on reducing between-laboratory variation. With some limitations, fresh whole blood and well-defined lyophilized specimens are suitable for purpose.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry

Cited by 46 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3