SELDI-TOF MS Whole Serum Proteomic Profiling with IMAC Surface Does Not Reliably Detect Prostate Cancer

Author:

McLerran Dale1,Grizzle William E2,Feng Ziding1,Thompson Ian M3,Bigbee William L4,Cazares Lisa H5,Chan Daniel W6,Dahlgren Jackie1,Diaz Jose5,Kagan Jacob7,Lin Daniel W8,Malik Gunjan5,Oelschlager Denise2,Partin Alan5,Randolph Timothy W1,Sokoll Lori6,Srivastava Shiv9,Srivastava Sudhir7,Thornquist Mark1,Troyer Dean3,Wright George L5,Zhang Zhen6,Zhu Liu2,Semmes O John5

Affiliation:

1. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA

2. University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL

3. University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX

4. University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute/Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA

5. Virginia Prostate Center, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA

6. Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore

7. National Cancer Institute, Rockville

8. University of Washington, Seattle, WA

9. Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Rockville

Abstract

Abstract Background: The analysis of bodily fluids using SELDI-TOF MS has been reported to identify signatures of spectral peaks that can be used to differentiate patients with a specific disease from normal or control patients. This report is the 2nd of 2 companion articles describing a validation study of a SELDI-TOF MS approach with IMAC surface sample processing to identify prostatic adenocarcinoma. Methods: We sought to derive a decision algorithm for classification of prostate cancer from SELDI-TOF MS spectral data from a new retrospective sample cohort of 400 specimens. This new cohort was selected to minimize possible confounders identified in the previous study described in the companion paper. Results: The resulting new classifier failed to separate patients with prostate cancer from biopsy-negative controls; nor did it separate patients with prostate cancer with Gleason scores <7 from those with Gleason scores ≥7. Conclusions: In this, the 2nd stage of our planned validation process, the SELDI-TOF MS–based protein expression profiling approach did not perform well enough to advance to the 3rd (prospective study) stage. We conclude that the results from our previous studies—in which differentiation between prostate cancer and noncancer was demonstrated—are not generalizable. Earlier study samples likely had biases in sample selection that upon removal, as in the present study, resulted in inability of the technique to discriminate cancer from noncancer cases.

Funder

National Cancer Institute

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry

Cited by 117 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3