DNA Methylation Biomarkers for Blood-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening

Author:

Lofton-Day Catherine1,Model Fabian2,DeVos Theo1,Tetzner Reimo2,Distler Juergen2,Schuster Matthias2,Song Xiaoling1,Lesche Ralf2,Liebenberg Volker2,Ebert Matthias3,Molnar Bela4,Grützmann Robert5,Pilarsky Christian5,Sledziewski Andrew1

Affiliation:

1. Epigenomics, Inc., Seattle, WA

2. Epigenomics AG, Berlin, Germany

3. Technical University, Munich, Germany

4. Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary

5. Technical University of Dresden, Dresden, Germany

Abstract

Abstract Background: Sensitive, specific blood-based tests are difficult to develop unless steps are taken to maximize performance characteristics at every stage of marker discovery and development. We describe a sieving strategy for identifying high-performing marker assays that detect colorectal cancer (CRC)-specific methylated DNA in plasma. Methods: We first used restriction enzyme–based discovery methods to identify marker candidates with obviously different methylation patterns in CRC tissue and nonpathologic tissue. We then used a selection process incorporating microarrays and/or real-time PCR analysis of tissue samples to further test marker candidates for maximum methylation in CRC tissue and minimum amplification in tissues from both healthy individuals and patients with other diseases. Real-time assays of 3 selected markers were validated with plasma samples from 133 CRC patients and 179 healthy control individuals in the same age range. Results: Restriction enzyme–based testing identified 56 candidate markers. This group was reduced to 6 with microarray and real-time PCR testing. Three markers, TMEFF2, NGFR, and SEPT9, were tested with plasma samples. TMEFF2 methylation was detected in 65% [95% confidence interval, 56%–73%] of plasma samples from CRC patients and not detected in 69% (62%–76%) of the controls. The corresponding results for NGFR were 51% (42%–60%) and 84% (77%–89%); for SEPT9, the values were 69% (60%–77%) and 86% (80%–91%). Conclusions: The stringent criteria applied at all steps of the selection and validation process enabled successful identification and ranking of blood-based marker candidates.

Funder

Deutsche Krebshilfe

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry

Cited by 415 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3