Temozolomide in Combination With Interferon-Alfa Versus Temozolomide Alone in Patients With Advanced Metastatic Melanoma: A Randomized, Phase III, Multicenter Study from the Dermatologic Cooperative Oncology Group

Author:

Kaufmann Roland1,Spieth Konstanze1,Leiter Ulrike1,Mauch Cornelia1,von den Driesch Peter1,Vogt Thomas1,Linse Ruthild1,Tilgen Wolfgang1,Schadendorf Dirk1,Becker Jürgen C.1,Sebastian Günther1,Krengel Sven1,Kretschmer Lutz1,Garbe Claus1,Dummer Reinhard1

Affiliation:

1. From the Departments of Dermatology, J.W. Goethe-University, Frankfurt am Main; University of Tübingen, Tübingen; University of Köln, Cologne; University of Erlangen, Erlangen/Stuttgart; University of Regensburg, Regensburg; Helios Clinic Erfurt, Erfurt; Saarland University, Homburg; Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center, Mannheim; University of Würzburg, Würzburg; University of Dresden, Dresden; University of Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Lübeck; University of Göttingen, Göttingen,...

Abstract

Purpose Temozolomide (TMZ) has shown efficacy in metastatic melanoma equal to that of dacarbazine (DTIC), the standard chemotherapeutic agent for melanoma. As the combination with interferon-alfa (IFN-α) appears superior to single-agent DTIC regarding response rates, the purpose of this study was to compare TMZ alone and TMZ plus IFN-α in terms of objective response (OR), overall survival, and safety in a prospective, randomized, multicenter trial. Patients and Methods Two hundred ninety-four patients with untreated stage IV metastatic melanoma (American Joint Committee on Cancer staging system) were randomly assigned to receive either oral TMZ alone (200 mg/m2/day; days 1 through 5 every 28 days) or in combination with subcutaneous IFN-α (5 MU/m2; days 1, 3, and 5 every week). Results Two hundred eighty-two patients were eligible for an intent-to-treat analysis, 271 patients were treated per protocol. In the TMZ + IFN-α arm, 33 (24.1%) of 137 patients responded to therapy (partial or complete remission) whereas in the monotherapy arm, in 18 (13.4%) of 134 patients, a response was evident. Thus, the response rate was significantly higher in the combination arm (P = .036). Median survival time was 8.4 months for patients treated with TMZ (95% CI, 7.07 to 9.27) and 9.7 months for those treated with the combination (95% CI, 8.26 to 11.18; P = .16). Dose modifications and interval prolongations due to hematologic toxicity were significantly more frequent in the TMZ + IFN-α arm (P < .001). Conclusion In metastatic melanoma treatment with TMZ + IFN-α leads to a significantly superior OR rate compared to treatment with TMZ alone, which did not translate into prolonged survival in our study population.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 94 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3