Sentinel Node Biopsy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer: Results From National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol B-27

Author:

Mamounas Eleftherios P.1,Brown Ann1,Anderson Stewart1,Smith Roy1,Julian Thomas1,Miller Barbara1,Bear Harry D.1,Caldwell Christopher B.1,Walker Alonzo P.1,Mikkelson Wendy M.1,Stauffer Jay S.1,Robidoux Andre1,Theoret Heather1,Sovan Atilla1,Fisher Bernard1,Wickerham D. Lawrence1,Wolmark Norman1

Affiliation:

1. From the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project; University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health; Allegheny General Hospital, Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA; Aultman Health Foundation, Canton, OH; Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, VA; Genesee Hospital, Rochester NY; Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI; The University of Texas, Health Sciences Center, Fredericksburg, TX; and Centre Hôspitalier de L'Université de Montréal, PQ, Canada

Abstract

Purpose Experience with sentinel node biopsy (SNB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy is limited. We examined the feasibility and accuracy of this procedure within a randomized trial in patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients and Methods During the conduct of National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project trial B-27, several participating surgeons attempted SNB before the required axillary dissection in 428 patients. All underwent lymphatic mapping and an attempt to identify and remove a sentinel node. Lymphatic mapping was performed with radioactive colloid (14.7%), with lymphazurin blue dye alone (29.9%), or with both (54.7%). Results Success rate for the identification and removal of a sentinel node was 84.8%. Success rate increased significantly with the use of radioisotope (87.6% to 88.9%) versus with the use of lymphazurin alone (78.1%, P = .03). There were no significant differences in success rate according to clinical tumor size, clinical nodal status, age, or calendar year of random assignment. Of 343 patients who had SNB and axillary dissection, the sentinel nodes were positive in 125 patients and were the only positive nodes in 70 patients (56.0%). Of the 218 patients with negative sentinel nodes, nonsentinel nodes were positive in 15 (false-negative rate, 10.7%; 15 of 140 patients). There were no significant differences in false-negative rate according to clinical patient and tumor characteristics, method of lymphatic mapping, or breast tumor response to chemotherapy. Conclusion These results are comparable to those obtained from multicenter studies evaluating SNB before systemic therapy and suggest that the sentinel node concept is applicable following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3