Biomarker Discovery and Outcomes for Comprehensive Cell-Free Circulating Tumor DNA Versus Standard-of-Care Tissue Testing in Advanced Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Author:

Palmero Ramon1,Taus Alvaro23,Viteri Santiago4,Majem Margarita5,Carcereny Enric6,Garde-Noguera Javier5,Felip Enriqueta7,Nadal Ernest1,Malfettone Andrea8,Sampayo Miguel8,Riva François8,Nagy Rebecca J.9,Lanman Richard B.9,Faull Iris9,Dix Daniel9,Karachaliou Niki10,Rosell Rafael10

Affiliation:

1. ICO Bellvitge, Hospitalet Llobregat/Spain

2. Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain

3. Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona (UAB), Barcelona, Spain

4. Quirón Salud-Dexeus University Institute, IOR, Medical Oncology Department, Barcelona, Spain

5. Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain

6. Institut Català d'Oncologia Badalona-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol B-ARGO, Badalona, Spain

7. Vall d’Hebron Institute of Oncology, Barcelona, Spain

8. Medica Scientia Innovation Research—MEDSIR, Barcelona, Spain and Ridgewood, NJ

9. Guardant Health, South San Francisco, CA

10. Catalan Institute of Oncology, Hospital Germans Trias I Pujol, Badalona, Spain

Abstract

Purpose Treatment guidelines for advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) recommend broad molecular profiling for targeted therapy selection. This study prospectively assessed comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS) of cell-free circulating tumor DNA (cfDNA) compared with standard-of-care (SOC) tissue-based testing to identify guideline-recommended alterations in aNSCLC. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with treatment-naïve aNSCLC were tested using a well-validated NGS cfDNA panel, and results were compared with SOC tissue testing. The primary objective was noninferiority of cfDNA vs. tissue analysis for the detection of two guideline-recommended biomarkers ( EGFR and ALK) and an additional six actionable biomarkers. Secondary analyses included tissue versus cfDNA biomarker discovery, overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) to targeted therapy, and positive predictive value (PPV) of cfDNA. RESULTS The primary objective was met with cfDNA identifying actionable mutations in 46 patients versus 48 by tissue ( P < .05). In total, 0/186 patients were genotyped for all eight biomarkers with tissue, compared with 90.8% using cfDNA. Targetable alterations or KRAS were identified in 80.7% when cfDNA was used first versus 57.1% when tissue was used first. PPV for cfDNA-detected EGFR was 100.0% (25/25). ORR and PFS in patients receiving targeted therapy based on tissue or cfDNA were similar to those previously reported. Conclusion This prospective study confirms a previous report that comprehensive cfDNA testing is noninferior to SOC tissue testing in detecting aNSCLC-recommended biomarkers. Furthermore, cfDNA-based first-line therapy produced outcomes similar to tissue-based testing, demonstrating the clinical utility of comprehensive cfDNA genotyping as the initial genotyping modality in patients with treatment-naïve aNSCLC when tissue is insufficient or when all actionable biomarkers cannot be rapidly assessed.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3