Circulating tumor cell-driven use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Author:

Beije Nick1,de Kruijff Ingeborg Elisabeth1,de Jong Joep2,Klaver Sjoerd O.3,de Vries Peter4,Jacobs Rens4,Somford Diederik Meindert5,te Slaa Ed6,van der Heijden Toine7,Witjes Johannes Alfred8,Fossion Laurent9,Boeve Egbert10,van der Hoeven John11,van Melick Harm H.E.12,Wijburg Carl J13,Martens John W.M.1,De Wit Ronald2,Kraan Jaco14,Sleijfer Stefan15,Boormans Joost L.16

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands;

2. Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands;

3. Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, Netherlands;

4. Zuyderland MC, Heerlen, Netherlands;

5. Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, Nijmegen, Netherlands;

6. Isala Hospital, Zwolle, Netherlands;

7. Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, Netherlands;

8. Department of Urology, Radboud University, Nijmegen, Netherlands;

9. Maxima MC, Eindhoven, Netherlands;

10. Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, Netherlands;

11. Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, Netherlands;

12. Sint Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein, Netherlands;

13. Department of Urology, Robotic Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, Netherlands;

14. Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Medical Oncology and Cancer Genomics Netherlands, Rotterdam, Netherlands;

15. Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands;

16. Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands;

Abstract

4523 Background: International guidelines for the treatment of non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) recommend neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), which, however, is underutilized in practice. We hypothesized that the absence of circulating tumour cells (CTCs), an established prognostic marker in MIBC, may identify patients with such a favourable prognosis that NAC may be withheld. Methods: The CirGuidance study included adults with clinical stage T2-T4aN0-N1M0 muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder who were fit to undergo radical cystectomy. CTCs were enumerated using the CellSearch system. CTC-negative patients (no CTCs detectable) underwent radical surgery without NAC; CTC-positive patients (≥1 detectable CTCs) were advised to receive NAC followed by radical surgery, but NAC could be withheld at the discretion of the treating physician. The primary endpoint was the two-year overall survival (OS) in the CTC-negative group, analysed in the intention-to-treat population. The prespecified criterion for trial success was a two-year OS of minimally 75% (95% confidence interval (CI) ±5%) in the CTC-negative group. Results: Of 315 patients screened for eligibility, 273 were enrolled in the study. The median age was 69 years; the median follow-up was 36 months. The two-year OS in the CTC-negative group was 69.5% (n = 203; 95% CI 62.6%-75.5%); in the CTC-positive group it was 58.2% (n = 70; 95% CI 45.5%-68.9%). CTC-positive patients had a higher rate of cancer-related mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 1.61, 95% CI 1.05-2.45, p = 0.03) and disease relapse (HR 1.87, 95% CI 1.28-2.73, p = 0.001) than CTC-negative patients. Explorative analyses suggested that CTC-positive patients who had received NAC (n = 22) survived longer than CTC-positive patients who had not (n = 48), with a two-year OS of 74.8% (95%CI 49.5%-88.8%) versus 52.0% (95% CI 37.2%-65.0%), respectively. Conclusions: The two-year OS in the CTC-negative group did not meet the prespecified criterion for trial success. However, given the trial population’s advanced age and high rate of non-cancer related mortality, the benefit of NAC is likely to be limited in CTC-negative MIBC patients. CTC enumeration at the moment of diagnosis could aid in the decision to prescribe neoadjuvant chemotherapy for a muscle-invasive bladder cancer patient as a criterion in addition to clinical characteristics. Clinical trial information: NL3954.

Funder

Erasmus MC Grants & Cancer Genomics Netherlands

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3