Pembrolizumab versus placebo as post-nephrectomy adjuvant therapy for patients with renal cell carcinoma: Randomized, double-blind, phase III KEYNOTE-564 study.

Author:

Choueiri Toni K.1,Tomczak Piotr2,Park Se Hoon3,Venugopal Balaji4,Ferguson Tom5,Chang Yen-Hwa6,Hajek Jaroslav7,Symeonides Stefan N.8,Lee Jae-Lyun9,Sarwar Naveed10,Thiery-Vuillemin Antoine11,Gross-Goupil Marine12,Mahave Mauricio13,Haas Naomi B.14,Sawrycki Piotr15,Zhang Eric (Pingye)16,Willemann Rogerio Jaqueline16,Imai Kentaro16,Quinn David I.17,Powles Thomas18

Affiliation:

1. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA;

2. Szpital Kliniczny Przemienienia Pańskiego UM, Poznan, Poland;

3. Division of Hematology-Oncology, Samsung Medical Center, Department of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea;

4. University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom;

5. Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia;

6. Department of Urology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan;

7. Fakultni Nemocnice Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic;

8. Edinburgh Cancer Research Centre, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom;

9. Asan Medical Center and University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea;

10. Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom;

11. University Hospital Jean Minjoz, Besançon, France;

12. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux-Hôpital Saint-André, Bordeaux, France;

13. Lopez Perez Foundation, Santiago, Chile;

14. Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania (ECOG-ACRIN), Philadelphia, PA;

15. Wojewodzki Szpital Zespolony im. L. Rydygiera w Toruniu, Torun, Poland;

16. Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ;

17. USC Norris Cancer Hospital, Los Angeles, CA;

18. Barts Cancer Institute, Cancer Research UK Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre, Queen Mary University of London, Royal Free National Health Service Trust, London, United Kingdom;

Abstract

LBA5 Background: Relapse after surgery for high-risk clear cell RCC (ccRCC) is associated with shortened life expectancy. Effective perioperative therapy to reduce this risk remains an unmet need. Adjuvant immune therapy is an attractive potential strategy for these pts. We conducted the KEYNOTE-564 trial to evaluate pembro vs placebo as adjuvant therapy for pts with RCC. Methods: KEYNOTE-564 is a phase III multicenter trial of pembro vs placebo in pts with histologically confirmed ccRCC, with intermediate-high risk (pT2, Gr 4 or sarcomatoid, N0 M0; or pT3, any Gr, N0 M0), high risk (pT4, any Gr, N0 M0; or pT any stage, any Gr, N+ M0), or M1 NED (no evidence of disease after primary tumor + soft tissue metastases completely resected ≤1 year from nephrectomy) (Leibovich et al, 2003; Fuhrman et al, 1982). Pts had undergone surgery ≤12 wks prior to randomization; had no prior systemic therapy; had ECOG PS 0 or 1. Study treatment was given for up to 17 cycles (≈1 yr). The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) per investigator assessment in all randomized pts (ITT population). Overall survival (OS) was a key secondary endpoint. Safety/tolerability were secondary endpoints, assessed in all treated pts. Results: Between Jun 30, 2017 and Sept 20, 2019, 994 pts were randomized 1:1 to pembro (n=496) or placebo (n=498). As of data cutoff date of Dec 14, 2020, median (range) follow-up, defined as time from randomization to data cutoff, was 24.1 (14.9−41.5) mo. No pts remain on study treatment. Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between arms. At first prespecified interim analysis, the primary endpoint of DFS was met (median not reached [NR] for both arms, HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.53−0.87; P=0.0010 [one-sided]). The estimated DFS rate at 24 mo was 77.3% with pembro vs 68.1% with placebo. Overall, DFS benefit was consistent across subgroups. A total of 51 OS events were observed (18 in the pembro arm, 33 in the placebo arm). Median OS was NR for both arms (HR 0.54, 95% CI 0.30−0.96; P=0.0164 [one-sided]); the p-value did not cross the statistical hypothesis testing boundary. The estimated OS rate at 24 mo was 96.6% with pembro vs 93.5% with placebo. 470 pts (96.3%) and 452 pts (91.1%) experienced ≥1 all-cause adverse events (AEs) with pembro vs placebo, respectively. Grade 3-5 all-cause AEs occurred in 158 pts (32.4%) with pembro and 88 pts (17.7%) with placebo. No deaths related to pembro occurred. Conclusions: Pembro demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in DFS vs placebo in pts with intermediate-high, high risk or M1 NED RCC. Additional follow-up is planned for the key secondary endpoint of OS. KEYNOTE-564 is the first positive phase III study with a checkpoint inhibitor in adjuvant RCC, and these results support pembro as a potential new standard of care for pts with RCC in the adjuvant setting. Clinical trial information: NCT03142334.

Funder

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 29 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3