Five-Year Outcomes With Nivolumab in Patients With Wild-Type BRAF Advanced Melanoma

Author:

Robert Caroline12ORCID,Long Georgina V.3ORCID,Brady Benjamin4,Dutriaux Caroline5,Di Giacomo Anna Maria6,Mortier Laurent7,Rutkowski Piotr8,Hassel Jessica C.9ORCID,McNeil Catriona M.10,Kalinka Ewa Anna11ORCID,Lebbé Céleste12ORCID,Charles Julie13,Hernberg Micaela M.14ORCID,Savage Kerry J.15ORCID,Chiarion-Sileni Vanna16ORCID,Mihalcioiu Catalin17,Mauch Cornelia18,Arance Ana19,Cognetti Francesco20ORCID,Ny Lars21ORCID,Schmidt Henrik22,Schadendorf Dirk2324ORCID,Gogas Helen25ORCID,Zoco Jesús26ORCID,Re Sandra27,Ascierto Paolo A.28ORCID,Atkinson Victoria29

Affiliation:

1. Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France

2. Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France

3. Melanoma Institute Australia, University of Sydney, and Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

4. Cabrini Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

5. Hôpital Saint André Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Bordeaux, France

6. Center for Immuno-Oncology, University Hospital of Siena, Siena, Italy

7. University of Lille, INSERM U1189, Service de Dermatologie, Chu Lille, Lille, France

8. Maria Skłodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland

9. National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany

10. Chris O’Brien Lifehouse, Melanoma Institute Australia, and Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

11. Polish Mother’s Memorial Hospital-Research Institute, Lodz, Poland

12. Université de Paris, INSERM U976, and Dermatology and CIC, AP-HP, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, France

13. Grenoble Alpes University Hospital, INSERM U1209, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France

14. Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

15. British Columbia Cancer Agency, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

16. Oncology Institute of Veneto Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Padua, Italy

17. Royal Victoria Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada

18. University Hospital Cologne and Centrum für Integrierte Onkologie Köln, Bonn, Germany

19. Hospital Clínic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

20. Regina Elena Institute, Rome, Italy

21. Department of Oncology, University of Gothenburg and Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden

22. Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark

23. Department of Dermatology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany

24. German Cancer Consortium, Heidelberg, Germany

25. National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece

26. Syneos Health, Braine l’Alleud, Belgium

27. Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ

28. Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, Naples, Italy

29. Princess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, and Gallipoli Medical Research Foundation, Greenslopes Private Hospital, Greenslopes, Queensland, Australia

Abstract

PURPOSE The CheckMate 066 trial investigated nivolumab monotherapy as first-line treatment for patients with previously untreated BRAF wild-type advanced melanoma. Five-year results are presented herein. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this multicenter, double-blind, phase III study, 418 patients with previously untreated, unresectable, stage III/IV, wild-type BRAF melanoma were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or dacarbazine 1,000 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), and secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. RESULTS Patients were followed for a minimum of 60 months from the last patient randomly assigned (median follow-up, 32.0 months for nivolumab and 10.9 months for dacarbazine). Five-year OS rates were 39% with nivolumab and 17% with dacarbazine; PFS rates were 28% and 3%, respectively. Five-year OS was 38% in patients randomly assigned to dacarbazine who had subsequent therapy, including nivolumab (n = 37). ORR was 42% with nivolumab and 14% with dacarbazine; among patients alive at 5 years, ORR was 81% and 39%, respectively. Of 42 patients treated with nivolumab who had a complete response (20%), 88% (37 of 42) were alive as of the 5-year analysis. Among 75 nivolumab-treated patients alive and evaluable at the 5-year analysis, 83% had not received subsequent therapy; 23% were still on study treatment, and 60% were treatment free. Safety analyses were similar to the 3-year report. CONCLUSION Results from this 5-year analysis confirm the significant benefit of nivolumab over dacarbazine for all end points and add to the growing body of evidence supporting long-term survival with nivolumab mono-therapy. Survival is strongly associated with achieving a durable response, which can be maintained after treatment discontinuation, even without subsequent systemic therapies.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3