Management of Cancer Cachexia: ASCO Guideline

Author:

Roeland Eric J.1,Bohlke Kari2,Baracos Vickie E.3,Bruera Eduardo4,del Fabbro Egidio5,Dixon Suzanne6,Fallon Marie7,Herrstedt Jørn8,Lau Harold9,Platek Mary10,Rugo Hope S.11,Schnipper Hester H.12,Smith Thomas J.13,Tan Winston14,Loprinzi Charles L.15

Affiliation:

1. Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, MA

2. American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA

3. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

4. MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

5. Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA

6. Cambia Health Solutions, Portland, OR

7. Edinburgh Oncology Centre, University of Edinburgh, UK

8. Zealand University Hospital Roskilde and University of Copenhagen, Denmark

9. University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

10. Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center and D’Youville College, Buffalo, NY

11. University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA

12. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA

13. Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD

14. Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL

15. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Abstract

PURPOSE To provide evidence-based guidance on the clinical management of cancer cachexia in adult patients with advanced cancer. METHODS A systematic review of the literature collected evidence regarding nutritional, pharmacologic, and other interventions, such as exercise, for cancer cachexia. PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews of RCTs published from 1966 through October 17, 2019. ASCO convened an Expert Panel to review the evidence and formulate recommendations. RESULTS The review included 20 systematic reviews and 13 additional RCTs. Dietary counseling, with or without oral nutritional supplements, was reported to increase body weight in some trials, but evidence remains limited. Pharmacologic interventions associated with improvements in appetite and/or body weight include progesterone analogs and corticosteroids. The other evaluated interventions either had no benefit or insufficient evidence of benefit to draw conclusions on efficacy. Limitations of the evidence include high drop-out rates, consistent with advanced cancer, as well as variability across studies in outcomes of interest and methods for outcome assessment. RECOMMENDATIONS Dietary counseling may be offered with the goals of providing patients and caregivers with advice for the management of cachexia. Enteral feeding tubes and parenteral nutrition should not be used routinely. In the absence of more robust evidence, no specific pharmacological intervention can be recommended as the standard of care; therefore, clinicians may choose not to prescribe medications specifically for the treatment of cancer cachexia. Nonetheless, when it is decided to trial a drug to improve appetite and/or improve weight gain, currently available pharmacologic interventions that may be used include progesterone analogs and short-term (weeks) corticosteroids.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3