Final overall survival (OS) analysis with modeling of crossover impact in the phase III GRID trial of regorafenib vs placebo in advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST).

Author:

Demetri George D.1,Reichardt Peter2,Kang Yoon-Koo3,Blay Jean-Yves4,Joensuu Heikki5,Schaefer Klaus6,Wagner Andrea6,Casali Paolo Giovanni7,Kappeler Christian6

Affiliation:

1. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Ludwig Center at Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

2. HELIOS Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany

3. Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

4. Centre Léon Bérard and Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France

5. Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland

6. Bayer Pharma AG, Berlin, Germany

7. Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy

Abstract

156 Background: GRID showed that regorafenib (REG) improves progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint) vs placebo (PBO) in patients (pts) with advanced GIST after failure of at least imatinib and sunitinib (HR 0.27; 1-sided p < 0.0001). An interim OS analysis at the time of the primary PFS analysis showed a positive trend (HR 0.77; p = 0.199) despite 85% of PBO pts crossing over to REG. An exploratory analysis modeling the impact of crossover on OS suggested a benefit for REG. We present exploratory analyses of OS comparing crossover correction results at different times, including at the planned final OS analysis. Methods: Data cut-off dates for OS analyses were 26 Jan 2012 (final PFS analysis), 31 Jan 2014, and 8 Jun 2015 (final OS analysis). The impact of crossover on OS was modeled using 2 randomization-based methods: rank preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) and iterative parameter estimation (IPE), both considered best choice among correction analytics. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs were derived using the Cox model. Results: Pts were randomized (2:1) to REG (n = 133) or PBO (n = 66). Data maturity in terms of deaths of randomized pts was 23%, 70%, and 81%. At data cut-off for the final OS analysis, a total of 162 deaths occurred: REG 109 (82%) and PBO 53 (80%); 7 pts remained on treatment. Compared to the 2012 OS analysis, continued crossover treatment further diluted the treatment effect, evidenced by the increasing HR in the ITT analysis at later times (Table). Conclusions: IPE correction provides more stable estimated median times and HRs than RPSFT. These exploratory analyses modeling the impact of crossover to active drug suggest that REG has a greater OS benefit than noted in the ITT analysis. Such sensitivity analytics are needed to understand fully the benefits of active drugs in crossover trials. Clinical trial information: NCT01271712. [Table: see text]

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3