Surgical decision making for breast cancer: Treatment preferences prior to surgery.

Author:

Yao Katharine1,Wroblewski Kristen2,Van Haitsma Martha3,Rabbitt Sarah1,Williams Jordan3,Kulkarni Swati4

Affiliation:

1. NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, IL

2. Health Studies, Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

3. The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL

4. The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL

Abstract

71 Background: Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) rates are increasing but it is unclear how many patients consider CPM prior to their surgery. Methods: We developed a 55 item survey validated with 20 breast cancer survivors which was administered to newly diagnosed breast cancer patients (n=136) at two institutions prior to surgery to determine factors associated with CPM treatment preference. Results: The median age was 58 years (range 30-85). Eighty-three (69.2%) were White. Thirty-eight (28.6%) of patients had a 1st degree relative with breast cancer. Fifty-three patients (39.8%) thought about their surgery choice prior to getting breast cancer. Seventy-four (57.8%) of patients considered undergoing a CPM during decision making process, 31 (24.2%) did not want/consider CPM and 23 (18.0%) did not think CPM was an option. Of the 74 women who considered CPM, 12 (16%) chose CPM. Nearly 70% of women who considered CPM felt that CPM reduced the chance that cancer would come back vs 43.3% of women who did not want/consider CPM (p=0.02) and 86% of women who considered CPM stated that lumpectomy and mastectomy patients have equivalent survival compared to 100% of patients who did not want/consider CPM (p=0.03). Women who considered CPM were more likely to rate the diagnostic process as very/extremely emotionally difficult (47.3% vs 22.6%, p=0.03) and to state that being diagnosed with breast cancer “sent them into a daze” than those not wanting/considering a CPM (37.5% vs 13.3%, p=0.02). Likewise, women considering CPM had higher rates of anxiety (49.3% vs 12.9%, p<0.001) and depression (19.7% vs 3.2%, p=0.03); were more likely to be very/extremely worried about getting cancer elsewhere in their body (43.8% vs 6.5%, p<0.001) and very/extremely worried about how a spouse/partner would feel about their changed body than those women who did not want/consider CPM (18.5% vs 0%, p=0.03). Women who did not think CPM was an option were older (p=0.02), less educated (p=0.05), more often single (p=0.05). Conclusions: Over 50% of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients consider CPM prior to their surgery. Women considering a CPM had greater worry about recurrence, higher anxiety levels and less knowledge than patients not wanting/considering CPM.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3