Regional differences in the treatment approaches for relapsed multiple myeloma: An IMF study.

Author:

Durie Brian G.1,Moreau Philippe2,Sonneveld Pieter3,Morgan Gareth J4,Lahuerta Juan José5,Beksac Meral6,Terpos Evangelos7,Hajek Roman8,Hungria Vânia Tietsche de Moraes9,Maiolino Angelo10,Chng WeeJoo11,Lee Jae Hoon12,Jian Hou13,Richardson Paul Gerard Guy14,Chen Wenming15,Knop Stefan16,Hoerring Antje17,Leleu Xavier18,San-Miguel Jesùs F.19,Kumar Shaji20,

Affiliation:

1. Cedars-Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA

2. University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France

3. Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands

4. Institute of Cancer Research, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, United Kingdom

5. Servicio de Hematología, Hospital Universitario, Madrid, Spain

6. Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey

7. University of Athens, Athens, Greece

8. University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czech Republic

9. Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericordia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

10. Hospital Universitário Clementino Fraga Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

11. National University Health System, Queenstown, Singapore

12. Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Hospital, Incheon, South Korea

13. Shanghai Changzheng Hospital, Shanghai, China

14. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

15. Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Beijing, China

16. University of Wuerzburg, Wurzburg, Germany

17. Cancer Research and Biostatistics, Seattle, WA

18. Service des Maladies du Sang, Hôpital Claude Huriez, Lille, France

19. Hospital Universitario de Salamanca, Salamanca, Spain

20. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Abstract

8095 Background: Multiple myeloma (MM) remains incurable and invariably relapses after initial therapy. There is no uniform approach to management of relapsed MM and is dictated by type of initial therapy and the response seen, and availability of new drugs. The outcomes associated with current approaches have not been systematically examined. Methods: We enrolled 383 patients (pts) with myeloma who had a documented relapse between Jan 2007 and June 2010, including 220 from Europe, 106 from Asia, and 31 from South America and 26 from North America. Time Zero (T0) was defined as date of treatment after first relapse. Results: Across the study, 61% were male and 49% were over 65 years at T0. ISS stage distribution at diagnosis included 26, 40 and 33% of patients in stages 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Among regimens used at first relapse; bortezomib (Btz) containing regimens were most common (54%), followed by lenalidomide (Len, 25%) and cyclophosphamide (21%). The overall response rate (>=PR) to first therapy after relapse was 58% including 14% with a CR. There was a progressive decrease in the response rates with successive regimen; 45%, 30% and 15% for regimens 2, 3 and 4 respectively. Len use was considerably lower in the Asian cohort, while Btz use was comparable across the regions. The median PFS from T0 was 13 mos and OS was 35 mos, for the entire cohort. The PFS to first salvage regimen was similar across the regions, while OS was shorter for the Asian and South American cohorts. In a univariate analysis, ISS stage 3, presence of cytogenetic abnormalities, history of plasma cell leukemia or extramedullary disease (EMD), bone marrow PC% > 33% and presence of renal insufficiency were all associated with a shorter PFS as well as shorter OS (P<=0.01). In a multivariate model, ISS stage 3 and presence of EMD were most associated with short OS. Conclusions: Median PFS for current second line regimens, typically containing Btz or Len appear to be 1 yr with an OS from first relapse of about 3 yrs. The OS from first relapse is nearly double that seen in a cohort of patients in first relapse prior to introduction of new drugs. Clear-cut regional differences can be seen in terms of patterns of drug use and likely reflect drug availability and healthcare costs.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3