A comparison of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in National Cancer Institute-sponsored cancer treatment trials conducted during two time periods: 1999–2003 and 2003–2008

Author:

O'Mara A. M.1,Denicoff A. M.1,Reeve B.1,Burns R.1,Trimble T.1

Affiliation:

1. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; The EMMES Corporation, Rockville, MD

Abstract

6618 Background: Over the past decade, the U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI) support for incorporating Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) into disease treatment clinical trials has grown considerably, both in the number of trials, as well as the types of research questions being addressed and the measures used to answer the questions. This presentation will compare the breadth of NCI supported Phase III treatment trials in breast, colo-rectal, lung, and prostate cancers that include PRO secondary endpoints activated during two time periods: 1999–2003 and 2003–2008. Both time periods will be compared to identify the number and type of PRO measures; in addition the targeted PRO domain will be examined by cancer site. Methods: For this study, PRO was broadly defined to include any self-report questionnaire that gathered data on the potential impact that disease treatment might have on patient functioning, quality of life, or symptoms. Using the terms, 'protocol title, lead disease, phase III, quality of life, and instrument name,’ a search was conducted of the NCI database containing breast, colo-rectal, lung, and prostate Phase III treatment trials activated during the two time periods. If a scale was used more than once or if different versions of the scale were used, i.e., FACT-G and FACT-BR, it was only counted once. Results: Between 1999 and 2003, 42 phase III trials in the four major cancers were activated, with 15 trials having one or more PROs as secondary endpoints. Between 2003 and 2008, 50 phase III trials in the four major cancers were activated, with 28 trials having one or more PROs as secondary endpoints. Although the data reveal a 20% increase in the number of phase III trials in the 4 diseases between the two time periods, the number of trials with PRO endpoints has doubled. Conclusions: This significant increase in the use of PROs in phase III trials gives investigators additional data to fully analyze the impact of new treatments. These PRO data will provide researchers, clinicians, and future patients with a more in-depth understanding of the potential for new cancer therapies and technologies to extend both the quantity and quality of life. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3