A randomized phase II study: Pazopanib (P) versus lapatinib (L) versus combination of pazopanib/lapatinib (L+P) in advanced and recurrent cervical cancer (CC)

Author:

Monk B.1,Mas L.1,Zarba J. J.1,Oaknin A.1,Tarpin C.1,Termrungruanglert W.1,Alber J. A.1,Ding J.1,Stutts N. W.1,Pandite L. N.1

Affiliation:

1. UCI Medical Center, Orange, CA; INEN - Medicina, Lima, Peru; Centro Medico San Roque, Tucuman, Argentina; Institut Català d`Oncologia, Hospital Duran I Reyn, Barcelona, Spain; Centre Regional de Lutte contrele Cancer, Marseille, France; Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand; GlaxoSmithKline, Collegeville, PA

Abstract

5520 Background: P and L are oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors. P targets VEGFR, PDGFR, and c-Kit. L targets EGFR and HER2 in CC, EGFR overexpression and markers of angiogenesis correlate with poor outcome; the prognostic value of HER2 overexpression remains unclear. Methods: Patients (pts) with measurable stage IVB, persistent or recurrent squamous or adenocarcinoma of the cervix not amenable to curative therapy; 0–1 prior regimens in the metastatic setting; ECOG PS 0–1; were randomized 1:1:1 to each of 3 treatment groups; not prescreened for EGFR or HER2 status. Treatment consisted of P 800mg QD; L 1,500 mg QD; L+P: P 400 mg + L 1,000 mg QD; the doses were escalated to P 800 mg + L 1,500 mg after 20 pts treated at 400 mg + 1,000 mg. Therapy continued until progression (PD), withdrawal due to adverse events (AEs), or withdrawal of consent. Primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS); secondary overall survival (OS), tumor response (RR), safety. The study had 85% power to detect 80% improvement in PFS. A hierarchical testing procedure was applied comparing L+P vs L followed by L+P vs P and P vs L. The futility boundary was crossed for L + P vs L at the planned interim analysis and this arm was discontinued. Only the comparison of P vs L at the final analysis is reported. Results: Total N = 235 pts: 152 in the monotherapy arms: P (78); L (74). Baseline characteristics were balanced: median age 49 yrs (23–81). Stage IVB: 5%; recurrent 62%; persistent 34%. 86% had prior radiotherapy (45% with chemotherapy); 42% had prior chemotherapy for recurrent/persistent disease. P improved PFS (HR = 0.66; 90% CI 0.48, 0.91 p = 0.013) and OS (HR = 0.67; 90% CI 0.46, 0.99 p = 0.045; median OS for P is 50.7 wks; L is 39.1 wks) with RR for P of 9% and L 5%. Most common AEs (%) P/L were diarrhea (54/58), nausea (36/33), anorexia (28/32), vomiting (20/24); the most common Gr 3 AE was diarrhea (11/13); Gr 4 for any individual AE was ≤ 1%; 1 Gr 5 event of cachexia unrelated to L. Conclusions: PFS and OS were significantly prolonged with P compared to L. P and L both demonstrated a favorable toxicity profile in pts with advanced and recurrent CC. This study demonstrates the potential benefit of P in CC. Further exploration is indicated. [Table: see text]

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3