Consolidation with high-dose chemotherapy for responding patients to standard chemotherapy in advanced, metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS): A randomized trial from FNCLCC-French Sarcoma Group

Author:

Binh N. N.1,Chevreau C.1,Penel N.1,Bay J.1,Coindre J.1,Mathoulin-Pelissier S.1,Ray-Coquard I.1,Italiano A.1,Genève J.1,Blay J.1

Affiliation:

1. PALSAR02 Clinical Trial Group; Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France; Institut Claudius Regaud, Toulouse, France; Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France; Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France; Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France; FNCLCC, Paris, France

Abstract

10505 Background: Whether high dose (HD) chemotherapy improves disease-free (DFS) or overall (OS) survival has been suggested in phase II trial, but never explored in a randomized setting. This randomized, open, phase III study was designed to assess whether or not an HD chemotherapy with peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) would improve OS in patients with advanced or metastatic STS responding to MAID chemotherapy. Methods: Pts aged 18 to 65 and with advanced STS were enrolled. After 4 courses of MAID, patients in PR or CR, or in whom complete surgical removal of all lesions was performed, were proposed for randomisation between 2 more cycles of MAID (control arm) vs 1 MAID followed by an intensification with MICE, ie: mesna (3.6g/m2, d1–5), ifosfamide (4g/m2, d1–4), carboplatin (UCA5, d2–4) and etoposide (300mg/m2, d1–4), followed by PBSC (HD arm). The primary endpoint was OS and the study was designed to detect by logrank test a 25% difference between the arms. Results: From 03/00 to 06/08, 266 patients were included and 87 were randomised (15 centres); low accrual and new treatment concepts lead to an IDMC in 11/08 who analysed 45 treated in the control arm (41 with full treatment) and 40 in the HD arm [only 21 received MICE, because consent withdrawal (6), insufficient PBSC harvest (5), tumor reprogression (4)]. Baseline characteristics (pts and tumors) were similar between treatment arms. With a 39 months follow-up, 25 pts were alive in the control arm, and 19 in the HD arm. The 3 years OS was 45.5% for control arm versus 35.8 for HD arm (HR = 1.12; 95% CI 0.58, 2.14; p = 0.72 Intention to treat analysis); PFS was 29.9% and 12.1 respectively (HR = 1.48; 95% CI 0.87, 2.53; p = 0.14). Higher rate of grade 3 - 4 hematologic (87% vs 46%), and digestive toxicity (33% vs 0%) were observed in the HD arm. Two treatment-related deaths occurred, both in the HD arm. Conclusions: In this study, HD chemotherapy for STS patients didn't improve OS and DFS. Consolidations with new concepts have to be explored. [Table: see text]

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3