Affiliation:
1. Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
Abstract
e11570 Background: Febrile neutropenia (FN) is an undesired effect of myelosuppressive chemotherapy (CTX). To date limited data on costs of FN management is available. We compared costs and reimbursement of FN in a study of BC patients during adjuvant anthracycline (AC)-based CTX. Methods: Prospective, observational, longitudinal study in primary BC patients, enrolled 1–12/2006 consecutively before start of CTX in a German university clinic. FN was defined as fever >38ºC + ANC <1x109/L. Clinical and resource use data + DRG reimbursement were analyzed from medical charts. Costs for inpatient therapy of FN were compared to DRG reimbursement and results are presented from provider's perspective. Results: Of all patients approached (n=61), n=54 signed informed consent (88.5%), n=2 withdraw (3.3%) and n=2 were excluded from evaluation because of non-AC-based CTX. Patients were on avg. 57.4 (32–74) years and otherwise healthy ECOG 1 (n=50; 100%). Tumor classification was T1 n=25, T2 n=19, ≥T3 n=5 and pTx n=1. Chemo regimen was either AC-based n=29 (58.0%) or AC+taxane-based n=21 (42.0%). 12 episodes of FN occurred (24.0%) in 11 patients, one patient had 2 episodes; n=11 were treated as inpatients, n=1 as outpatient. Hospital stay for inpatients was on avg. 5.4 days (4–8), 0.7 days below average according to G-DRG catalog. Mean cost per FN episode requiring hospital treatment was 1.827 €, SD ±795 € (95%CI: 1293, 2361). Basic hospital costs were 83%, drug treatment 9% and diagnostics 8% of total direct costs. DRG reimbursement for inpatient FN was 2.145 € per episode, thus cost covering for the provider. Avg. reimbursement rate/day was 417 € (253–665 €). Inadequately DRG coding (n=4) resulted in a loss of 1.069 €/case (-42.2%). Conclusions: Costs for FN treatment vary among patients and DRG reimbursement does not necessarily reflect providers’ costs. Main cost drivers are hospitalization, length of stay, diagnostics and antibiotics. Surprisingly, inpatient treatment of FN under current therapy regimen is cost covering if adequately coded. This prospective evaluation and calculation of provider's costs and reimbursement helps understanding the allocation of resources for rational and cost-covering therapy. [Table: see text]
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)