Clinical Activity of Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase–Targeted Therapies in Patients With Non–V600 BRAF-Mutant Tumors

Author:

Dankner Matthew123ORCID,Wang Yifan2345ORCID,Fazelzad Rouhi67ORCID,Johnson Benny89,Nebhan Caroline A.10ORCID,Dagogo-Jack Ibiayi11ORCID,Myall Nathaniel J.12,Richtig Georg13ORCID,Bracht Jillian W.P.14ORCID,Gerlinger Marco15,Shinozaki Eiji16ORCID,Yoshino Takayuki17ORCID,Kotani Daisuke17ORCID,Fangusaro Jason R.18ORCID,Gautschi Oliver19,Mazieres Julien20ORCID,Sosman Jeffrey A.21,Kopetz Scott89ORCID,Subbiah Vivek8ORCID,Davies Michael A.8ORCID,Groover Anna L.22,Sullivan Ryan J.11ORCID,Flaherty Keith T.11ORCID,Johnson Douglas B.10ORCID,Benedetti Andrea23,Cescon David W.724ORCID,Spreafico Anna724,Zogopoulos George2345ORCID,Rose April A.N.12425ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Lady Davis Institute, Segal Cancer Centre, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada

2. Rosalind and Morris Goodman Cancer Institute, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada

3. Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada

4. Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada

5. Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada

6. Library and Information Services, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

7. Division of Medical Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

8. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

9. Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Houston, TX

10. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

11. Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

12. Division of Oncology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA

13. Division of Oncology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

14. Quirón-Dexus University Institute, Barcelona, Spain

15. Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London and St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom

16. Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research Cancer Institute Hospital, Tokyo, Japan

17. Department of Gastroenterology and Gastrointestinal Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan

18. Aflac Cancer Center, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA

19. University of Bern and Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland

20. Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France

21. Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL

22. BioMed Valley Discoveries, Kansas City, MO

23. Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada

24. Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

25. Department of Oncology, McGill University, Montréal, Québec, Canada

Abstract

PURPOSE Non-V600 mutations comprise approximately 35% of all BRAF mutations in cancer. Many of these mutations have been identified as oncogenic drivers and can be classified into three classes according to molecular characteristics. Consensus treatment strategies for class 2 and 3 BRAF mutations have not yet been established. METHODS We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis with published reports of individual patients with cancer harboring class 2 or 3 BRAF mutations from 2010 to 2021, to assess treatment outcomes with US Food and Drug Administration–approved mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway targeted therapy (MAPK TT) according to BRAF class, cancer type, and MAPK TT type. Coprimary outcomes were response rate and progression-free survival. RESULTS A total of 18,167 studies were screened, identifying 80 studies with 238 patients who met inclusion criteria. This included 167 patients with class 2 and 71 patients with class 3 BRAF mutations. Overall, 77 patients achieved a treatment response. In both univariate and multivariable analyses, response rate and progression-free survival were higher among patients with class 2 compared with class 3 mutations, findings that remain when analyses are restricted to patients with melanoma or lung primary cancers. MEK ± BRAF inhibitors demonstrated greater clinical activity in class 2 compared with class 3 BRAF-mutant tumors than BRAF or EGFR inhibitors. CONCLUSION This meta-analysis suggests that MAPK TTs have clinical activity in some class 2 and 3 BRAF-mutant cancers. BRAF class may dictate responsiveness to current and emerging treatment strategies, particularly in melanoma and lung cancers. Together, this analysis provides clinical validation of predictions made on the basis of a mutation classification system established in the preclinical literature. Further evaluation with prospective clinical trials is needed for this population.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3