A Remote Symptom Monitoring Tool As Part of Ambulatory Cancer Surgery Recovery: A Qualitative Analysis of Patient Experience

Author:

McCready Taylor M.12ORCID,Stabile Cara3,Vickers Andrew4ORCID,Ancker Jessica S.5,Pusic Andrea6,Temple Larissa K.F.7,Simon Brett A.18ORCID,Carter Jeanne3910ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Josie Robertson Surgery Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

2. Current Address: Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY

3. Department of Surgery, Gynecology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

5. Department of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN

6. Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA

7. Department of Surgery, Colorectal Surgery Division, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY

8. Department of Anesthesiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY

9. Department of Psychiatry, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY

10. Department of Psychology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY

Abstract

PURPOSE Patients recovering from ambulatory cancer surgery at home may find it difficult to determine whether their postoperative symptoms are normal or potentially serious. We developed the Recovery Tracker to help patients navigate such issues. The Recovery Tracker is a 10-day, web-based electronic survey that monitors symptoms daily and provides feedback as to whether reported symptoms are expected or require follow-up. We sought to examine patient perceptions using this tool. METHODS Semistructured interviews were conducted from August 2017 to September 2019 with a convenience sample of patients from a larger randomized controlled trial of the Recovery Tracker. Patients undergoing surgery at an ambulatory cancer center dedicated to the surgical treatment of breast, gynecologic, urologic, head, and neck cancers and benign tumors were included. Thematic analysis was applied to derive key themes and codes via NVivo qualitative analysis software. Recruitment was conducted iteratively until thematic saturation. RESULTS Forty-three patients were interviewed. Interview responses were organized into five main themes: (1) The Recovery Tracker led to more seamless communication with the care team; (2) symptoms not expected or not listed on the Recovery Tracker caused stress; (3) the Recovery Tracker was perceived as an extension of care, prompting reflection about symptoms and recovery; (4) Enhanced Feedback provided reassurance and helped set expectations; and (5) the Recovery Tracker was easy to use. CONCLUSION The patient experience of electronic symptom monitoring and feedback is congruent with the aims of such monitoring and feedback. Further qualitative research is required in more diverse populations.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Oncology (nursing),Health Policy,Oncology

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Telemedicine and Cancer Clinical Research;The Cancer Journal;2024-01

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3