Multi-Institutional Study of Referral Patterns for Gynecologic Oncology Consultation

Author:

DeMari Joseph A.1ORCID,Madeka Isheeta1,Evans Joni K.2ORCID,Bailey Courtney3,Bartucci Kristen4,Bottsford-Miller Justin5,Bradford Leslie6,Burnett Brian1,Kelly Rebeca7ORCID,Rowland Michelle4,Wallbillich John J.7ORCID,Shalowitz David I.89ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Section on Gynecologic Oncology, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC

2. Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC

3. Division of Gynecological Oncology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA

4. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, MO

5. Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Billings Clinic, Billings, MT

6. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, MaineHealth, Portland, ME

7. Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, MI

8. West Michigan Cancer Center, Kalamazoo, MI

9. Collaborative on Equity in Rural Cancer Care, Kalamazoo, MI

Abstract

PURPOSE Evaluation by a gynecologic oncologist (GO) is associated with improved clinical outcomes for patients with gynecologic cancers, yet little is known about health care factors that influence patients' referrals to GO. METHODS Medical records of 50 consecutive new patients seen in GO clinics at each of six referral centers across the United States were reviewed. Patient and disease characteristics were collected along with referral indication, evaluation and referral dates, diagnostic procedures, provider specialties, and zone improvement plan (ZIP) code of up to three referring providers per patient. The primary outcome was interval between first evaluation and referral. Univariate associations were evaluated with Chi-square and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests and multivariable associations with negative binomial regression models. Secondary outcome was prolonged time to GO referral, defined as greater than the 75th percentile. Logistic regression was used for multivariable modeling. RESULTS Three hundred patient records were analyzed. The median time from first health care encounter to referral was 15 days (IQR, 5-43). The mean distance from residence to GO was 39.8 miles (standard deviation, 53.8). Seventy-one percent of GO referrals were initiated by obstetrician-gynecologists, 9% by family physicians, and 6% internists. Presentation-to-referral interval was 76% shorter for patients evaluated by an emergency medicine clinician (exp(Beta), 0.24; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.53; P < .001). Public insurance was associated with 1.47 times longer time to referral compared with private insurance (exp(Beta), 1.47; 95% CI, 1.05 to 2.04; P = .001). Residents of nonmetropolitan ZIP codes were less likely to have prolonged time to referral (odds ratio [OR], 0.288; P = .017). Distance from residence to GO (per 10 miles) increased the likelihood of prolonged time to referral (OR, 1.10; P = .010). CONCLUSION Interventions are needed to improve recognition and referral of patients for gynecologic oncology evaluation. Community outreach and engagement with obstetrician-gynecologists should be prioritized to improve times to referral.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3