Renal Medullary Carcinoma: Establishing Standards in Practice

Author:

Beckermann Kathryn E.1,Sharma Deva1,Chaturvedi Shruti1,Msaouel Pavlos1,Abboud Miguel R.1,Allory Yves1,Bourdeaut Franck1,Calderaro Julien1,de Cubas Aguirre A.1,Derebail Vimal K.1,Hong Andrew L.1,Naik Rakhi P.1,Malouf Gabriel G.1,Mullen Elizabeth A.1,Reuter Victor E.1,Roberts Charles W.M.1,Walker Cheryl L.1,Wood Christopher G.1,DeBaun Michael R.1,Van Poppel Hendrik1,Tannir Nizar M.1,Rathmell W. Kimryn1

Affiliation:

1. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville; St Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX; American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon; Université Paris-Est Créteil, Créteil; Institut Curie; University Pierre and Marie Curie, Paris, France; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC; Dana-Farber/Boston Children’s Cancer and Blood Disorders Center, Boston; Broad Institute of...

Abstract

Although renal medullary carcinoma (RMC) is a rare subtype of kidney cancer, it is particularly devastating in that it is nearly uniformly lethal. No established guidelines exist for the diagnosis and management of RMC. In April 2016, a panel of experts developed clinical guidelines on the basis of a literature review and consensus statements. The goal was to propose recommendations for standardized diagnostic and management approaches and to establish an international clinical registry and biorepository for RMC. Published data are limited to case reports and small retrospective reviews. The RMC Working Group prepared recommendations to inform providers and patients faced with a low level of medical evidence. The diagnosis of RMC should be considered in all patients younger than 50 years with poorly differentiated carcinoma that arises from the renal medulla. These patients should be tested for sickle cell hemoglobinopathies, and if positive, SMARCB1/INI1 loss should be confirmed by immunohistochemistry. The majority of patients with RMC are diagnosed with metastatic disease. Upfront radical nephrectomy should be considered in patients with good performance status and low metastatic burden or after response to systemic therapy. Currently, cytotoxic, platinum-based chemotherapy provides the best, albeit brief, palliative clinical benefit. Vascular endothelial growth factor–directed therapies and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors are ineffective in RMC as monotherapy. Therapeutic trials of novel agents are now available for RMC, and every effort should be made to enroll patients in clinical studies.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Health Policy,Oncology (nursing),Oncology

Cited by 60 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3