Preoperative Chemotherapy Followed by Surgery Compared With Primary Surgery in Resectable Stage I (Except T1N0), II, and IIIa Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
-
Published:2002-01-01
Issue:1
Volume:20
Page:247-253
-
ISSN:0732-183X
-
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Oncology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JCO
Author:
Depierre Alain1, Milleron Bernard1, Moro-Sibilot Denis1, Chevret Sylvie1, Quoix Elisabeth1, Lebeau Bernard1, Braun Denis1, Breton Jean-Luc1, Lemarié Etienne1, Gouva Sylvie1, Paillot Nadine1, Bréchot Jeanne-Marie1, Janicot Henri1, Lebas François-Xavier1, Terrioux Philippe1, Clavier Jean1, Foucher Pascal1, Monchâtre Michel1, Coëtmeur Daniel1, Level Marie-Claude1, Leclerc Pascal1, Blanchon François1, Rodier Jean-Michel1, Thiberville Luc1, Villeneuve Anne1, Westeel Virginie1, Chastang Claude1,
Affiliation:
1. From the J Minjoz University Hospital, Besançon; Tenon University Hospital, Paris; St Louis University Hospital; St Antoine University Hospital; Hôtel Dieu Univesity Hospital; and Bichat University Hospital, Paris; Michalon University Hospital, Grenoble; University Hospital, Strasbourg; General Hospital, Briey; General Hospital, Belfort; Bretonneau University Hospital, Tours; A. Morvan University Hospital, Brest; General Hospital, Metz; University Hospital, Clermont-Ferrand; General Hospital, Le Mans;...
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate whether preoperative chemotherapy (PCT) could improve survival in resectable stage I (except T1N0), II, and IIIA non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A randomized trial compared PCT to primary surgery (PRS). PCT consisted of two cycles of mitomycin (6 mg/m2, day 1), ifosfamide (1.5 g/m2, days 1 to 3) and cisplatin (30 mg/m2, days 1 to 3), and two additional postoperative cycles for responding patients. In both arms, patients with pT3 or pN2 disease received thoracic radiotherapy. RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-five eligible patients were randomized. Overall response to PCT was 64%. There were two preoperative toxic deaths. Postoperative mortality was 6.7% in the PCT arm and 4.5% in the PRS arm (P = .38). Median survival was 37 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 26.7 to 48.3) for PCT and 26.0 months (95% CI, 19.8 to 33.6) for PRS (P = .15). Survival differences between both arms increased from 3.8% (95% CI, 1.3% to 25.1%) at 1 year to 8.6% (95% CI, 2.64% to 24.4%) at 4 years. A quantitative interaction between N status and treatment was observed, with benefit confined to N0 to N1 disease (relative risk [RR], 0.68; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.96; P = .027). After a nonsignificant excess of deaths during treatment, the effect of PCT was significantly favorable on survival (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.99; P = .044). Disease-free survival time was significantly longer in the PCT arm (P = .033). CONCLUSION: Although impressive differences in median, 3-year, and 4-year survival were observed, they were not statistically significant, except for stage I and II disease.
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology
Cited by
32 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|