Randomized Phase II Study of Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin or Carboplatin, With or Without Cetuximab, As First-Line Therapy for Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
-
Published:2007-12-20
Issue:36
Volume:25
Page:5777-5784
-
ISSN:0732-183X
-
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Oncology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JCO
Author:
Butts Charles A.1, Bodkin David1, Middleman Edward L.1, Englund Craig W.1, Ellison David1, Alam Yasmin1, Kreisman Harvey1, Graze Peter1, Maher James1, Ross Helen J.1, Ellis Peter M.1, McNulty William1, Kaplan Edward1, Pautret Virginie1, Weber Martin R.1, Shepherd Frances A.1
Affiliation:
1. From the Cross Cancer Institute, Edmonton, Alberta; Windsor Regional Cancer Center, Windsor; Juravinski Cancer Centre at Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Canada University Health Network, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Ontario; Sir Mortimer B. Davis Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quèbec, Canada; Sharp Health Care, San Diego, CA; Dallas Oncology Consultants, Dallas, TX; The Florida Wellcare Alliance, Inverness, FL; Charleston Hematology/Oncology, Charleston, SC; Annapolis Oncology Center,...
Abstract
PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy of cetuximab added to first-line gemcitabine/platinum in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and MethodsIn this noncomparative, randomized trial, chemotherapy-naïve patients with recurrent/metastatic NSCLC (stage IV or stage IIIB with malignant pleural effusion) were eligible. Patients received cisplatin (75 mg/m2IV, every 3 weeks) or carboplatin (area under the concentration-versus-time curve of 5 intravenously [IV], every 3 weeks), and gemcitabine (1,250 or 1,000 mg/m2IV, days 1 and 8) plus cetuximab (400 mg/m2IV day 1, followed by 250 mg/m2weekly), in arm A, or chemotherapy alone, in arm B. Response rate was the primary end point; safety, progression-free survival, and overall survival were secondary end points.ResultsSixty-five patients were randomly assigned to arm A and 66 to arm B. Partial responses were observed in 18 patients (27.7%; 95% CI, 17.3 to 40.2) in arm A and 12 (18.2%; 95% CI, 9.8 to 29.6) in arm B. Median progression-free survival was 5.09 months for arm A (95% CI, 4.17 to 5.98) and 4.21 months (95% CI, 3.81 to 5.49) in arm B. Median overall survival was 11.99 months (95% CI, 8.80 to 15.18) and 9.26 months (95% CI, 7.43 to 11.79) in arms A and B, respectively. Overall toxicity was acceptable and consistent with the profiles of the individual agents.ConclusionFirst-line treatment with cetuximab plus gemcitabine/platinum is well tolerated and can be administered safely in patients with advanced NSCLC. Differences in response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival suggest that the addition of cetuximab to platinum/gemcitabine may improve clinical outcomes. Larger studies are in progress to address this hypothesis.
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology
Reference43 articles.
1. American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts and Figures 2006. Atlanta, GA, American Cancer Society, 2006 2. Canadian Cancer Society/National Cancer Institute of Canada: Canadian Cancer Statistics 2006. Toronto, Canada, 2006 3. Ettinger DS, Akerley W, Bepler G, et al: NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: Non-small cell lung cancer V1.2007. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/PDF/nscl.pdf 4. American Society of Clinical Oncology Treatment of Unresectable Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer Guideline: Update 2003 5. Monoclonal antibodies to target epidermal growth factor receptor-positive tumors
Cited by
182 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|