Phase III Trial of Protracted Compared With Split-Course Chemoradiation for Esophageal Carcinoma: Fédération Francophone de Cancérologie Digestive 9102

Abstract

Purpose Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is an alternative to surgery for resectable locally advanced esophageal carcinoma (RLA-EC). We investigated the heterogeneity of the treatment benefits across subgroups of patients, defined according to the radiation scheme. Patients and Methods Between February 1993 and December 2000, 451 patients were enrolled. The following two schemes were allowed: protracted radiotherapy (P-RT), which scheduled 46 Gy over 4.5 weeks or split-course radiotherapy (SC-RT) with two 1-week courses of 15 Gy. Two courses of cisplatin and fluorouracil were delivered concomitantly. In case of exclusive CRT, a further course of 20 Gy over 2 weeks in the P-RT group and one 1-week course of 15 Gy in the SC-RT group were delivered with three courses of chemotherapy. SC-RT and P-RT were administered to 285 patients (64%) and 161 patients (36%), respectively. Results For P-RT versus SC-RT, the response rate to induction CRT was 67% v 68%, respectively (P = .09), and 2-year local relapse-free survival rate was 76.7% v 56.8%, respectively (P = .002). Shorter tumor length and P-RT were associated with better local control in multivariate analysis (P = .002 for both). After a median follow-up time of 47.4 months, 2-year overall survival rate was 37.1% for P-RT compared with 30.5% for SC-RT (P = .25). Independent prognostic factors on survival were tumor diameter (P = .02), weight loss of 10% or less (P = .05), and response to induction CRT (P = .002). Conclusion Patients with RLA-EC treated with P-RT had better local control than patients treated with SC-RT. Response to induction CRT is a determinant prognostic factor on survival.