Use of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Phase III Cancer Treatment Trials: Lessons Learned and Future Directions

Author:

Ganz Patricia A.1,Gotay Carolyn C.1

Affiliation:

1. From the University of California, Los Angeles Schools of Medicine and Public Health, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control Research, Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA; and Cancer Research Center of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI

Abstract

PurposeThis article examines the challenges, opportunities, and successes that have occurred in the incorporation of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in phase III cancer clinical trials.MethodsAn informal survey of the leadership of US cooperative group PRO investigators identified diverse trials in which PROs had been measured. Exemplary trials were selected for lessons learned and for examination of successful strategies.ResultsWe review four challenging trials in depth, illustrating some of the difficulties in integrating PROs within treatment trials, including issues related to missing data, lack of procedures for monitoring patients and ensuring collection of PRO data, and missed opportunities in publication of treatment and PRO outcomes together. Four examples of successful trials are highlighted.ConclusionAs a result of this review, the authors make specific recommendations related to the use of PROs in phase III trials, focusing on issues related to design, choice of PRO instrument and frequency of administration, analysis, and publication strategies.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Reference21 articles.

1. Karnofsky DA, Burchenal JH: The clinical evaluation of chemotherapeutic agents in cancer, in Macleod CM (ed): Evaluation of Chemotherapeutic Agents . New York, NY, Columbia University Press, pp 199,1949-205

2. Karnofsky performance status revisited: reliability, validity, and guidelines.

3. Sugarbaker PH, Barofsky I, Rosenberg SA, et al: Quality of life assessment of patients in extremity sarcoma clinical trials. Surgery 91:17,1982-23,

4. Priestman TJ, Baum M: Evaluation of quality of life in patients receiving treatment for advanced breast cancer. Lancet 1:899,1976-900,

5. Quality of life assessment in patients receiving adjuvant therapy for breast cancer: The IBCSG approach

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3