Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized Trial of a New Organizational Modality for Providing Information and Support to Cancer Patients

Author:

Passalacqua Rodolfo1,Caminiti Caterina1,Campione Francesco1,Diodati Francesca1,Todeschini Renata1,Bisagni Giancarlo1,Labianca Roberto1,Dalla Chiesa Matteo1,Bracci Raffaella1,Aragona Marcello1,Artioli Fabrizio1,Cavanna Luigi1,Masina Alceste1,De Falco Francesco1,Marzocchini Barbara1,Iacono Carmelo1,Contu Antonio1,Di Costanzo Francesco1,Bertetto Oscar1,Annunziata Maria A.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Division of Medical Oncology, Istituti Ospitalieri, Cremona; Epidemiology and Research Unit, University Hospital of Parma, Parma; Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Bologna; Psychology Unit, National Cancer Institute of Naples, Naples; Medical Oncology Divisions of Messina, Carpi, Torino, Reggio Emilia, Ancona, Piacenza, Sassari, Firenze, Ragusa, Bergamo, Imola, and Trieste; and Psychology Unit, National Cancer Institute of Aviano, Aviano, Italy.

Abstract

Purpose No structured modality for providing information and support to patients in oncology wards has been validated in clinical trials. Methods This is a pragmatic, two-arm, cluster randomized trial, with the oncology ward as random assignment unit. Centers were allocated to implement a Point of Information and Support (PIS) or to a control group. The PIS included a library for cancer patients and a specifically trained oncology nurse. End points, measured at patient level, were psychological distress and satisfaction with received information. Both intent-to-treat and per-protocol analyses considering clustering were performed. Results Thirty-eight Italian cancer centers were randomly assigned, and 6 months after PIS creation, 3,286 unselected, consecutive cancer patients were surveyed (1,654 in the experimental group and 1,632 in the control group). Three thousand one hundred ninety-seven (97%) questionnaires were collected and deemed valid. Fifty-two percent of centers (11 of 21 centers) in the experimental arm did not implement the PIS in accordance with the protocol. Overall, 34% of patients showed moderate to severe psychological distress, and only 9% declared dissatisfaction. Intent-to-treat analysis did not yield significant differences. Although the per-protocol analysis did show a reduction in psychological distress (28.9% for functioning PIS v 33.3% for no PIS) and dissatisfaction (6.4% for functioning PIS v 9.3% for no PIS), differences did not reach significance. Conclusion This is the first cluster randomized trial aiming to demonstrate that a structured modality of providing information reduces psychological distress. We did not find this, but we believe results should be interpreted cautiously, particularly because of the low compliance with PIS implementation. Context analysis preceding such interventions is essential.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3