Double-Blind Randomized Phase II Study of the Combination of Sorafenib and Dacarbazine in Patients With Advanced Melanoma: A Report From the 11715 Study Group
-
Published:2008-05-01
Issue:13
Volume:26
Page:2178-2185
-
ISSN:0732-183X
-
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Oncology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JCO
Author:
McDermott David F.1, Sosman Jeffrey A.1, Gonzalez Rene1, Hodi F. Stephen1, Linette Gerald P.1, Richards Jon1, Jakub James W.1, Beeram Muralidhar1, Tarantolo Stefano1, Agarwala Sanjiv1, Frenette Gary1, Puzanov Igor1, Cranmer Lee1, Lewis Karl1, Kirkwood John1, White J. Michael1, Xia Chenghua1, Patel Kiran1, Hersh Evan1
Affiliation:
1. From the Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center; Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, TN; University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Aurora, CO; Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO; Lutheran General Cancer Care Center, Park Ridge, IL; Lakeland Regional Cancer Center, Lakeland, FL; University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, TX; Nebraska Methodist Hospital, Omaha, NB; St Luke's Health System, Bethlehem; University of...
Abstract
PurposeThis phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of sorafenib plus dacarbazine in patients with advanced melanoma.Patients and MethodsThis randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study enrolled chemotherapy-naïve patients with stage III (unresectable) or IV melanoma. A total of 101 patients received placebo plus dacarbazine (n = 50) or sorafenib plus dacarbazine (n = 51). On day 1 of a 21-day cycle, patients received intravenous dacarbazine 1,000 mg/m2for a maximum of 16 cycles. Oral sorafenib 400 mg or placebo was administered twice a day continuously. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by independent assessment. Secondary and tertiary end points included time to progression (TTP), response rate, and overall survival (OS).ResultsMedian PFS in the sorafenib plus dacarbazine arm was 21.1 weeks versus 11.7 weeks in the placebo plus dacarbazine arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.665; P = .068). There were statistically significant improvements in PFS rates at 6 and 9 months, and in TTP (median, 21.1 v 11.7 weeks; HR, 0.619) in favor of the sorafenib plus dacarbazine arm. No difference in OS was observed (median, 51.3 v 45.6 weeks in the placebo plus dacarbazine and sorafenib plus dacarbazine arms, respectively; HR, 1.022). The regimen was well tolerated and had a manageable toxicity profile.ConclusionSorafenib plus dacarbazine was well tolerated in patients with advanced melanoma and yielded an encouraging improvement in PFS. Based on these findings, additional studies with the combination are warranted in this patient population.
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology
Reference31 articles.
1. Cancer Statistics, 2007 2. The New Melanoma Staging System 3. Balch CM, Reintgen DS, Kirkwood JM, et al: Cutaneous melanoma, in De Vita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA (eds): Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology (ed 5) . Philadelphia, PA, Lippincott, pp 1935,1997-1993 4. A Population-Based Validation of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Melanoma Staging System
Cited by
216 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|