Increasing Racial and Ethnic Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Cancer Treatment Trials: Evaluation of an ASCO-Association of Community Cancer Centers Site Self-Assessment

Author:

Guerra Carmen1ORCID,Pressman Alice2,Hurley Patricia3ORCID,Garrett-Mayer Elizabeth3ORCID,Bruinooge Suanna S.3ORCID,Howson Alexandra4ORCID,Kaltenbaugh Melinda3ORCID,Hanley Williams Jen3ORCID,Boehmer Leigh5ORCID,Bernick Lea Ann6,Byatt Leslie7,Charlot Marjory8ORCID,Crews Jennie9,Fashoyin-Aje Lola10,McCaskill-Stevens Worta11,Merrill Janette3ORCID,Nowakowski Greg12ORCID,Patel Manali I.13ORCID,Ramirez Amelie14ORCID,Zwicker Victoria5,Oyer Randall A.1516ORCID,Pierce Lori J.17

Affiliation:

1. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

2. Sutter Health, Sacramento, CA

3. American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA

4. Thistle Editorial LLC, Snoqualmie, WA

5. Association of Community Cancer Centers, Rockville, MD

6. Sutter Cancer Research Consortium, Novato, CA

7. University of New Mexico Comprehensive Cancer Center, Albuquerque, NM

8. University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC

9. Stanford University, Stanford, CA

10. FDA Oncology Center of Excellence, Silver Spring, MD

11. NCI, Community Oncology and Prevention Trials Research Group, Bethesda, MD

12. Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

13. Stanford Health Care, Palo Alto, CA

14. University of Texas Health San Antonio, San Antonio, TX

15. Penn Medicine Lancaster General Health, Lancaster, PA

16. Ann B Barshinger Cancer Institute, Lancaster, PA

17. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI

Abstract

Clinical trial participants do not reflect the racial and ethnic diversity of people with cancer. ASCO and the Association of Community Cancer Centers collaborated on a quality improvement study to enhance racial and ethnic equity, diversity, and inclusion (EDI) in cancer clinical trials. The groups conducted a pilot study to examine the feasibility, utility, and face validity of a two-part clinical trial site self-assessment to enable diverse types of research sites in the United States to (1) review internal data to assess racial and ethnic disparities in screening and enrollment and (2) review their policies, programs, procedures to identify opportunities and strategies to improve EDI. Overall, 81% of 62 participating sites were satisfied with the assessment; 82% identified opportunities for improvement; and 63% identified specific strategies and 74% thought the assessment had potential to help their site increase EDI. The assessment increased awareness about performance (82%) and helped identify specific strategies (63%) to increase EDI in trials. Although most sites (65%) were able to provide some data on the number of patients that consented, only two sites were able to provide all requested trial screening, offering, and enrollment data by race and ethnicity. Documenting and evaluating such data are critical steps toward improving EDI and are key to identifying and addressing disparities more broadly. ASCO and Association of Community Cancer Centers will partner with sites to better understand their processes and the feasibility of collecting screening, offering, and enrollment data in systematic and automated ways.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Oncology (nursing),Health Policy,Oncology

Cited by 8 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3