Patient Understanding of Tumor Genomic Testing: A Quality Improvement Effort

Author:

Senter Leigha1,Veney Deloris2,Surplus Taylor3ORCID,Haynam Marcy2,Adams Elizabeth J.2,Hampel Heather14ORCID,Toland Amanda E.15ORCID,Presley Carolyn J.2ORCID,Padamsee Tasleem J.6ORCID,Lee Clara N.7,Hovick Shelly R.3,Stover Daniel G.289ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Division of Human Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

2. Division of Medical Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

3. School of Communication, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH

4. Division of Clinical Cancer Genomics, Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, CA

5. Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH

6. Division of Health Services Management and Policy, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH

7. Recruitment, Intervention and Survey Shared Resource, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH

8. Department of Biomedical Informatics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH

9. Pelotonia Institute for Immuno-Oncology, Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer, Columbus, OH

Abstract

PURPOSE: Tumor genomic testing (TGT) has become increasingly adopted as part of standard cancer care for many cancers. Despite national guidelines around patient education before TGT, available evidence suggests that most patients' understanding of genomics remains limited, particularly lower-income and minority patients, and most patients are not informed regarding potential incidental germline findings. METHODS: To investigate and address limitations in patient understanding of TGT results, a Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) approach is being used to assess needs, identify opportunities for improvement, and implement approaches to optimize patient education. We reviewed published guidelines related to pre-TGT provider-patient education and to identify key points (Plan). A provider quality improvement survey was completed (Do), which highlighted inconsistency in pre-TGT discussion practice across providers and minimal discussion with patients regarding the possibility of incidental germline findings. RESULTS: Patient focus groups and interviews (N = 12 patients) were completed with coding of each transcript (Study), which revealed themes including trouble differentiating TGT from other forms of testing, yet understanding that results could tailor therapy. The integration of data across this initial PDSA cycle identified consistent themes and opportunities, which were incorporated into a patient-directed, concise animated video for pre-TGT education (Act), which will form the foundation of a subsequent PDSA cycle. The video addresses how TGT may/may not inform treatment, the process for TGT using existing tissue or liquid biopsy, insurance coverage, and the potential need for germline genetics follow-up because of incidental findings. CONCLUSION: This PDSA cycle reveals key gaps and opportunities for improvement in patient education before TGT.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Oncology (nursing),Health Policy,Oncology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3