Social and Racial Differences in Selection of Breast Cancer Adjuvant Chemotherapy Regimens

Author:

Griggs Jennifer J.1,Culakova Eva1,Sorbero Melony E.S.1,Poniewierski Marek S.1,Wolff Debra A.1,Crawford Jeffrey1,Dale David C.1,Lyman Gary H.1

Affiliation:

1. From the University of Rochester, Rochester, NY; RAND Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA; University of Washington, Seattle, WA; and the Duke Comprehensive Cancer Center and the Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC

Abstract

Purpose Breast cancer outcomes are worse among black women and women of lower socioeconomic status. The purpose of this study was to investigate racial and social differences in selection of breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy regimens. Methods Detailed information on patient, disease, and treatment factors was collected prospectively on 957 patients who were receiving breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy in 101 oncology practices throughout the United States. Adjuvant chemotherapy regimens included in any of several published guidelines were considered standard. Receipt of nonstandard regimens was examined according to clinical and nonclinical factors. Differences between groups were assessed using χ2 tests. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with use of nonstandard regimens. Results Black race (P = .008), lower educational attainment (P = .003), age ≥ 70 years (P = .001), higher stage (P < .0001), insurance type (P = .048), employment status (P = .045), employment type (P = .025), and geographic location (P = .021) were associated with the use of nonstandard regimens in univariate analyses. In multivariate analysis, black race (P = .020), lower educational attainment (P = .024), age ≥ 70 years (P = .032), and higher stage (P < .0001) were associated with receipt of nonstandard regimens. Conclusion The more frequent use of non–guideline-concordant adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in black women and women with lower educational attainment may contribute to less favorable outcomes in these populations. Addressing such differences in care may improve cancer outcomes in vulnerable populations.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3