Assessment of Care by Breast Cancer Patients Participating or Not Participating in a Randomized Controlled Trial: A Report With the Patients' Committee for Clinical Trials of the Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer

Author:

Julian-Reynier Claire1,Genève Jean1,Dalenc Florence1,Genre Dominique1,Monnier Alain1,Kerbrat Pierre1,Largillier Rémy1,Serin Daniel1,Rios Maria1,Roché Henri1,Jimenez Marta1,Tarpin Carole1,Maraninchi Dominique1

Affiliation:

1. From the Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, U379, Epidemiology and Social Sciences Unit; Aix Marseille Université, Faculté des Sciences/de Médecine; Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille; Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte contre le Cancer, Paris; Claudius Regaud Institute, Toulouse; André Boulloche Centre, Montbéliard; Eugène Marquis Centre, Rennes; Antoine Lacassagne Centre, Nice; Sainte Catherine Institute, Avignon; and the Alexis Vautrin Centre, Vandoeuvre-Lès-Nancy, France

Abstract

Purpose Cancer patients participating in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have not been found to have better clinical outcomes than other patients. Our objective was to assess the impact of RCTs on patients' satisfaction with care. Patients and Methods A prospective study was carried out in a cohort of women with breast cancer (N = 455) divided into those invited to participate in an RCT (201 acceptances, 66 refusals) and a comparable control group not invited to participate (n = 188). All the patients underwent the same treatment (fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide 100 mg/m2 for six cycles). One and 7 months after the beginning of chemotherapy, self-administered satisfaction scores were used to compare the women's assessment of their care (Comprehensive Assessment of Satisfaction with Care validated scale). Results At the beginning of chemotherapy, women to whom RCT had been proposed rated the doctors' availability (average ± standard deviation [SD]: RCT acceptance group, 3.60 ± 0.78; RCT refusal group, 3.68 ± 0.87; control group, 3.41 ± 0.82; P ≤ .02) and the doctors' communication (average ± SD: RCT acceptance group, 3.56 ± 0.88; RCT refusal group, 3.67 ± 0.88; control group, 3.39 ± 0.84; P ≤ .05) higher than those to whom the trial was not proposed. After the treatment, participants in the RCT felt that their doctor was more supportive (average ± SD: RCT acceptance group, 3.04 ± 0.92; control group, 2.77 ± 0.85; P = .005) and more informative about their illness and treatment (average ± SD: RCT acceptance group, 3.34 ± 0.88; control group, 3.08 ± 0.92; P = .006) than those in the control group. The general level of satisfaction was also higher in the RCT acceptance group. Conclusion Women participating in an RCT have a more positive picture of their doctors' care than others, probably because of the structural effects of the informed consent and data collection processes.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3