Intensive Chemotherapy for Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results of the Randomized Intercontinental Trial ALL IC-BFM 2002

Author:

Stary Jan1,Zimmermann Martin1,Campbell Myriam1,Castillo Luis1,Dibar Eduardo1,Donska Svetlana1,Gonzalez Alejandro1,Izraeli Shai1,Janic Dragana1,Jazbec Janez1,Konja Josip1,Kaiserova Emilia1,Kowalczyk Jerzy1,Kovacs Gabor1,Li Chi-Kong1,Magyarosy Edina1,Popa Alexander1,Stark Batia1,Jabali Yahia1,Trka Jan1,Hrusak Ondrej1,Riehm Hansjörg1,Masera Giuseppe1,Schrappe Martin1

Affiliation:

1. Jan Stary, Jan Trka, and Ondrej Hrusak, Charles University and University Hospital Motol, Prague; Yahia Jabali, Regional Hospital, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic; Martin Zimmermann and Hansjörg Riehm, Medical School Hannover, Hannover; Martin Schrappe, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany; Myriam Campbell, Roberto del Rio Hospital, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Luis Castillo, Hospital Pereira Rossell, Montevideo, Uruguay; Eduardo Dibar, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires,...

Abstract

Purpose From 2002 to 2007, the International Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster Study Group conducted a prospective randomized clinical trial (ALL IC-BFM 2002) for the management of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in 15 countries on three continents. The aim of this trial was to explore the impact of differential delayed intensification (DI) on outcome in all risk groups. Patients and Methods For this trial, 5,060 eligible patients were divided into three risk groups according to age, WBC, early treatment response, and unfavorable genetic aberrations. DI was randomized as follows: standard risk (SR), two 4-week intensive elements (protocol III) versus one 7-week protocol II; intermediate risk (IR), protocol III × 3 versus protocol II × 1; high risk (HR), protocol III × 3 versus either protocol II × 2 (Associazione Italiana Ematologia Oncologia Pediatrica [AIEOP] option), or 3 HR blocks plus single protocol II (Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster [BFM] option). Results At 5 years, the probabilities of event-free survival and survival were 74% (± 1%) and 82% (± 1%) for all 5,060 eligible patients, 81% and 90% for the SR (n = 1,564), 75% and 83% for the IR (n = 2,650), and 55% and 62% for the HR (n = 846) groups, respectively. No improvement was accomplished by more intense and/or prolonged DI. Conclusion The ALL IC-BFM 2002 trial is a good example of international collaboration in pediatric oncology. A wide platform of countries able to run randomized studies in ALL has been established. Although the alternative DI did not improve outcome compared with standard treatment and the overall results are worse than those achieved by longer established leukemia groups, the national results have generally improved.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3