Clinical Models to Define Response and Survival With Anti–PD-1 Antibodies Alone or Combined With Ipilimumab in Metastatic Melanoma

Author:

Pires da Silva Inês123ORCID,Ahmed Tasnia1,McQuade Jennifer L.4ORCID,Nebhan Caroline A.5ORCID,Park John J.6ORCID,Versluis Judith M.7,Serra-Bellver Patricio8ORCID,Khan Yasir8ORCID,Slattery Tim9,Oberoi Honey K.10,Ugurel Selma11ORCID,Haydu Lauren E.3ORCID,Herbst Rudolf12ORCID,Utikal Jochen1314,Pföhler Claudia15,Terheyden Patrick16ORCID,Weichenthal Michael17ORCID,Gutzmer Ralf18ORCID,Mohr Peter19,Rai Rajat1,Smith Jessica L.3,Scolyer Richard A.122021ORCID,Arance Ana M.10ORCID,Pickering Lisa9,Larkin James9ORCID,Lorigan Paul822ORCID,Blank Christian U.7ORCID,Schadendorf Dirk11ORCID,Davies Michael A.4ORCID,Carlino Matteo S.13,Johnson Douglas B.5ORCID,Long Georgina V.1223ORCID,Lo Serigne N.1ORCID,Menzies Alexander M.123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

2. Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

3. Westmead and Blacktown Hospitals, Sydney, Australia

4. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX

5. Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN

6. Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia

7. Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

8. The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom

9. The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom

10. Hospital Clinic, Barcelona & IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain

11. University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Essen, Essen, Germany

12. Helios Klinikum Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany

13. Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany

14. Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany

15. Saarland University Medical Center, Homburg/Saar, Germany

16. Department of Dermatology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany

17. University Skin Cancer Center Kiel, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany

18. Skin Cancer Center, Department of Dermatology, Mühlenkreiskliniken, Ruhr University Bochum Campus Minden, Minden, Germany

19. Elbe-Klinikum Buxtehude, Buxtehude, Germany

20. Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, Australia

21. Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia

22. Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

23. Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, Sydney, Australia

Abstract

PURPOSE Currently, there are no robust biomarkers that predict immunotherapy outcomes in metastatic melanoma. We sought to build multivariable predictive models for response and survival to anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti–PD-1) monotherapy or in combination with anticytotoxic T-cell lymphocyte-4 (ipilimumab [IPI]; anti–PD-1 ± IPI) by including routine clinical data available at the point of treatment initiation. METHODS One thousand six hundred forty-four patients with metastatic melanoma treated with anti–PD-1 ± IPI at 16 centers from Australia, the United States, and Europe were included. Demographics, disease characteristics, and baseline blood parameters were analyzed. The end points of this study were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The final predictive models for ORR, PFS, and OS were determined through penalized regression methodology (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method) to select the most significant predictors for all three outcomes (discovery cohort, N = 633). Each model was validated internally and externally in two independent cohorts (validation-1 [N = 419] and validation-2 [N = 592]) and nomograms were created. RESULTS The final model for predicting ORR (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.71) in immunotherapy-treated patients included the following clinical parameters: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, presence/absence of liver and lung metastases, serum lactate dehydrogenase, blood neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, therapy (monotherapy/combination), and line of treatment. The final predictive models for PFS (AUC = 0.68) and OS (AUC = 0.77) included the same variables as those in the ORR model (except for presence/absence of lung metastases), and included presence/absence of brain metastases and blood hemoglobin. Nomogram calculators were developed from the clinical models to predict outcomes for patients with metastatic melanoma treated with anti–PD-1 ± IPI. CONCLUSION Newly developed combinations of routinely collected baseline clinical factors predict the response and survival outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma treated with immunotherapy and may serve as valuable tools for clinical decision making.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3