Management of Refractory Germ Cell Cancer

Abstract

Over the past 5 decades, the use of well-validated, guideline-based strategies has resulted in high cure rates in newly diagnosed patients with germ cell cancer. However, about 30% of those with metastatic disease at initial presentation will experience refractory disease. Salvage treatment is far more complex and less validated than first-line treatment because it is rare, patient cohorts are more heterogeneous, and prognostic factors seem to have greater impact. Prior to the initiation of any salvage treatment, several considerations must be made, including assessment of known prognostic factors and choice of the optimal salvage strategy. Evaluation of patients according to their disease biology, response to prior treatment, and the extent of their tumor burden at the time of salvage treatment is crucial for establishing the optimal salvage strategy. Patients with metastatic germ cell cancer in whom adequate cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy fails should be included in the ongoing randomized TIGER trial comparing conventional-dose chemotherapy with high-dose chemotherapy as first salvage treatment. Outside this trial, patients may be treated with conventional or high-dose chemotherapy depending on the presence or absence of adverse prognostic factors, availability of resources, and patient and physician preferences.