Meta-analysis of surrogate endpoints for survival in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor-based regimens.

Author:

Zhu Andrew X.1,Lin Yong2,Ferry David Raymond2,Widau Ryan C2,Saha Abhijoy2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA & Jiahui International Cancer Center, Jiahui Health, Shanghai, China;

2. Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN;

Abstract

483 Background: Overall survival (OS) remains the gold standard for demonstrating clinical benefit in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). While surrogate radiology-based endpoints for OS, such as progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) are commonly used in the field of oncology, they remain controversial in the setting of HCC where antiangiogenic agents were the mainstay of treatment until recently. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) as monotherapy or in combination have shifted the treatment paradigm in HCC. We investigated the surrogacy of radiology-based endpoints from CPI clinical trials in advanced HCC. Methods: Study level data were collected for disclosures published in EMBASE, PubMed, Clinicaltrials.gov and conference abstracts. Keywords used included (abbreviated here): immune CPIs, advanced or metastatic HCC and ORR, PFS and OS. Key inclusion criteria included: Phase I, II and III trial data, and patients with advanced or metastatic HCC who received CPI monotherapy or in a combination regimen. The endpoints investigated were median OS (mOS), median PFS (mPFS) and ORR (RECIST v1.1). A weighted Pearson correlation coefficient, with weights corresponding to the number of patients in the different treatment arms of the trials, was calculated between ORR/mOS, ORR/mPFS and mPFS/mOS in all arms, arms that included only patients with Child-Pugh A liver function, and arms in the first-line therapy setting. 95% confidence intervals (CIs) based on the empirical bootstrap re-sampling method are also reported. Results: Eighteen clinical trials (8 randomized trials and 10 multi-cohort trials) published between 2017 and 2021, including 3,246 patients across 32 treatment arms, were selected for inclusion in this meta-analysis. Ten trials included CPI monotherapy arms, 5 trials included CPI + TKI arms, 4 trials included CPI + anti-angiogenic monoclonal antibody arms, and 2 trials included CPI + CPI arms. There was 1 CPI + chemotherapy arm and 1 CPI + CPI + TKI arm in separate trials. Weighted Pearson correlation coefficients and corresponding 95% CIs are presented in the table. Conclusions: Our analysis suggests ORR/mOS, ORR/mPFS, and mPFS/mOS are positively correlated, with ORR/mPFS more strongly correlated compared to the other pairs, in patients with advanced HCC who were treated with CPI-based regimens. [Table: see text]

Funder

Eli Lilly and Company.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3