Refining American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control TNM Stage and Prognostic Groups for Human Papillomavirus–Related Oropharyngeal Carcinomas
-
Published:2015-03-10
Issue:8
Volume:33
Page:836-845
-
ISSN:0732-183X
-
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Oncology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JCO
Author:
Huang Shao Hui1, Xu Wei1, Waldron John1, Siu Lillian1, Shen Xiaowei1, Tong Li1, Ringash Jolie1, Bayley Andrew1, Kim John1, Hope Andrew1, Cho John1, Giuliani Meredith1, Hansen Aaron1, Irish Jonathan1, Gilbert Ralph1, Gullane Patrick1, Perez-Ordonez Bayardo1, Weinreb Ilan1, Liu Fei-Fei1, O'Sullivan Brian1
Affiliation:
1. Shao Hui Huang, Wei Xu, John Waldron, Lillian Siu, Xiaowei Shen, Li Tong, Jolie Ringash, Andrew Bayley, John Kim, Andrew Hope, John Cho, Meredith Giuliani, Aaron Hansen, Jonathan Irish, Ralph Gilbert, Patrick Gullane, Bayardo Perez-Ordonez, Ilan Weinreb, Fei-Fei Liu, and Brian O'Sullivan, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto; and Fei-Fei Liu and Brian O'Sullivan, Ontario Cancer Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
Purpose To refine stage and prognostic group for human papillomavirus (HPV) –related nonmetastatic (M0) oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). Methods All patients with nonmetastatic (M0) p16-confirmed OPC treated with radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy from 2000 to 2010 were included. Overall survival (OS) was compared among TNM stages for patients with HPV-related and HPV-unrelated OPC separately. For HPV-related OPC, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) derived new RPA stages objectively. Cox regression was used to calculate adjusted hazard ratios (AHRs) to derive AHR stages. The performance of survival prediction of RPA stage and AHR stage was assessed against the current seventh edition TNM stages. Prognostic groups were derived by RPA, combining RPA stage and nonanatomic factors. Results The cohort comprised 573 patients with HPV-related OPC and 237 patients with HPV-unrelated OPC, with a median follow-up of 5.1 years. Lower 5-year OS with higher TNM stage was evident for patients with HPV-unrelated OPC (stage I, II, III, and IV 5-year OS: 70%, 58%, 50%, and 30%, respectively; P = .004) but not for patients with HPV-related OPC (stage I, II, III, and IV 5-year OS: 88%, 78%, 71%, and 74%, respectively; P = .56). RPA divided HPV-related OPC into RPA-I (T1-3N0-2b), RPA-II (T1-3N2c), and RPA-III (T4 or N3; 5-year OS: 82%, 76%, and 54%, respectively; P < .001). AHR also yielded a valid classification, but RPA stage demonstrated better survival prediction. A further RPA (including RPA stage, age, and smoking pack-years [PYs]) derived the following four valid prognostic groups for survival: group I (T1-3N0-N2c_≤ 20 PY), group II (T1-3N0-N2c_> 20 PY), group III (T4 or N3_age ≤ 70), and group IVA (T4 or N3_age > 70; 5-year OS: 89%, 64%, 57%, and 40%, respectively; P < .001). Conclusion An RPA-based TNM stage grouping (stage I/II/III: T1-3N0-N2b/T1-3N2c/T4 or N3, with M1 as stage IV) is proposed for HPV-related OPC as a result of significantly improved survival prediction compared with the seventh edition TNM, and prognostication is further improved by an RPA-based prognostic grouping within the American Joint Committee on Cancer/Union for International Cancer Control TNM framework for HPV-related OPC.
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology
Reference32 articles.
1. The TNM system: Our language for cancer care 2. A worldwide approach to the TNM staging system: Collaborative efforts of the AJCC and UICC 3. S Edge, DR Byrd, CC Compton: Pharynx, AJCC Cancer Staging Manual 41– 56,2010 ed 7 New York, NY Springer 4. L Sobin, M Gospodarowicz, C Wittekind: Pharynx, International Union Against Cancer: TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours 30– 38,2010 ed 7 Chichester, United Kingdom Wiley-Blackwell
Cited by
349 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|