Phase III Multinational, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Tivantinib (ARQ 197) Plus Erlotinib Versus Erlotinib Alone in Previously Treated Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Nonsquamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer
-
Published:2015-08-20
Issue:24
Volume:33
Page:2667-2674
-
ISSN:0732-183X
-
Container-title:Journal of Clinical Oncology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:JCO
Author:
Scagliotti Giorgio1, von Pawel Joachim1, Novello Silvia1, Ramlau Rodryg1, Favaretto Adolfo1, Barlesi Fabrice1, Akerley Wallace1, Orlov Sergey1, Santoro Armando1, Spigel David1, Hirsh Vera1, Shepherd Frances A.1, Sequist Lecia V.1, Sandler Alan1, Ross Jeffrey S.1, Wang Qiang1, von Roemeling Reinhard1, Shuster Dale1, Schwartz Brian1
Affiliation:
1. Giorgio Scagliotti and Silvia Novello, University of Turin, Orbassano, Torino; Adolfo Favaretto, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, Padova; Armando Santoro, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy; Joachim von Pawel, Asklepios-Fachkliniken München-Gauting, Munich, Germany; Rodryg Ramlau, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland; Fabrice Barlesi, Aix Marseille University, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France; Wallace Akerley, Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT;...
Abstract
Purpose Tivantinib, a MET receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor, demonstrated increased anticancer activity in preclinical and early clinical studies when combined with erlotinib. Our study aimed to confirm efficacy and safety of the combination in previously treated patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods Patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC previously treated with one to two systemic regimens, including a platinum doublet, were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive erlotinib 150 mg daily plus oral tivantinib 360 mg twice daily (E + T) or erlotinib plus placebo (E + P) until disease progression. Tumor specimens were evaluated for EGFR and KRAS mutations, MET expression, and MET gene amplification. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary and exploratory objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), OS in molecular subgroups, and safety. Results The study enrolled 1,048 patients and was discontinued for futility at the interim analysis. OS did not improve with E + T versus E + P (median OS, 8.5 v 7.8 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.98; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.15; P = .81), even though PFS increased (median PFS, 3.6 v 1.9 months; HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.62 to 0.89; P < .001). Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested OS improvement in patients with high MET expression (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.49 to 1.01). Most common adverse events occurring with E + T versus E + P were rash (33.1% v 37.3%, respectively), diarrhea (34.6% v 41.0%), asthenia or fatigue (43.5% v 38.1%), and neutropenia (grade 3 to 4; 8.5% v 0.8%). Conclusion E + T was well tolerated and increased PFS but did not improve OS in the overall nonsquamous NSCLC population.
Publisher
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Subject
Cancer Research,Oncology
Cited by
232 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|