Breast cancer screening adherence at multiple timepoints over eight years among women in a familial cohort.

Author:

Schaeffer Marcy L.1,May Betty J1,Hogan Brenna C.1,Orellana Mikiaila M.1,McCullough Michelle C.1,Armstrong Deborah Kay2,Myers Kelly3,Visvanathan Kala2

Affiliation:

1. Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD;

2. The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD;

3. The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD;

Abstract

1557 Background: Since 2007, U.S. guidelines recommend cancer-free women with ≥20% lifetime breast cancer (BC) risk undergo BC screening with mammogram and breast MRI. There is limited long-term data on BC screening adherence among young, high-risk women. To address this knowledge gap, we examined utilization of multiple BC screening modalities over time. Methods: Eligible women were ≥ 30 years old, had no history of BC/ovarian cancer, an intact breast, are enrolled in the Breast and Ovarian Surveillance Service (BOSS) Cohort, and visited the Johns Hopkins Cancer Genetics Clinic for risk assessment within 2 months of cohort enrollment (N = 374). All screening was self-reported at baseline, 4, and 8 years. A subset has been validated. We categorized women by BC risk (Tyrer-Cuzick version) obtained at the clinic. We examined frequency of screening over follow-up, and defined adherence to annual mammography and breast MRI based on age- and risk-based guidelines. We modeled the association between BC risk and adherence at 4 and 8 years using logistic regression. Results: At baseline, the median age was 47 years, 31% had lifetime risk < 20%, and 69% had risk ≥20%. Frequency of mammography and clinical breast exam over follow-up was > 60%, while frequency of breast MRI and breast ultrasound was < 40%. Twenty-five percent of high-risk women at 4 years and 40% at 8 years did not report any mammography, breast MRI, or breast ultrasound. At 4 years, high-risk women were 85% less adherent [multivariable adjusted OR = 0.15; 95%CI = 0.07, 0.34] to BC screening guidelines compared to women with a risk of < 20% due to low uptake of breast MRI, while at 8 years, high-risk women were also less adherent to mammography [multivariable adjusted OR = 0.42; 95%CI = 0.18, 0.95]. We observed similar associations among women at high-risk at 5- and 10-years. Adherence at 4 years predicted adherence at 8 years. Interestingly, women who did not uptake MRI complied with other health screening including for colorectal cancer. Conclusions: High-risk women were not adherent to risk-appropriate BC screening, and adherence did not improve over time. Low adherence appears specific to BC screening. New approaches to BC screening are urgently needed for this high-risk group.

Publisher

American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)

Subject

Cancer Research,Oncology

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3